David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Social Philosophy 39 (4):666-669 (2008)
This paper argues that Leif Wenar's theory of reparations is not purely forward-looking and that backward-looking considerations play an important role: if there had never been a past injustice, then reparations for the future cannot be acceptable. Past injustice compose the first part of a two-tiered theory of reparations. We must first discover a past injustice has taken place: reparations are for the repair of previous damage. However, for Wenar, not all past injustices warrant reparations. Once we have first passed the initial test of demonstrating a past injustice has taken place, we then determine whether or not to finally accept reparations based upon forward-looking considerations. What is important to note is that this decision to award reparations is based upon forward-looking considerations, but only after first satisfying the test of a past injustice. Thus, backward-looking considerations make up an important first part of Wenar's two-tiered theory of reparations. It is not my argument that this theory is unsafe and I find Wenar's arguments both novel and highly compelling. However, the view that this theory is forward-looking -- and not backward-looking -- is not entirely accurate. My brief reply corrects this part of an important new theory of reparations in the hope of strengthening its persuasive power.
|Keywords||reparations Wenar global justice|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Howard Mcgary (2010). Reconciliation and Reparations. Metaphilosophy 41 (4):546-562.
Ernesto Verdeja (2006). Reparations in Democratic Transitions. Res Publica 12 (2):115-136.
Jon Miller & Rahul Kumar (eds.) (2007). Reparations: Interdisciplinary Inquiries. Oxford University Press.
Pablo De Greiff (ed.) (2006). The Handbook of Reparations. Oxford University Press.
Lawrie Balfour (2005). Reparations After Identity Politics. Political Theory 33 (6):786 - 811.
Derrick Darby (2010). Reparations and Racial Inequality. Philosophy Compass 5 (1):55-66.
Chris Buck (2004). Sartre, Fanon, and the Case for Slavery Reparations. Sartre Studies International 10 (2):123-138.
Leif Wenar (2006). Reparations for the Future. Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (3):396–405.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #196,884 of 1,926,181 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #271,894 of 1,926,181 )
How can I increase my downloads?