Graduate studies at Western
Oxford University Press (2012)
|Abstract||This book shows that civil disobedience is generally more defensible than private conscientious objection. Part I explores the morality of conviction and conscience. Each of these concepts informs a distinct argument for civil disobedience. The conviction argument begins with the communicative principle of conscientiousness. According to this principle, having a conscientious moral conviction means not just acting consistently with our beliefs and judging ourselves and others by a common moral standard. It also means not seeking to evade the consequences of our beliefs and being willing to communicate to them to others. The conviction argument shows that, as a constrained, communicative practice, civil disobedience has a better claim than private objection does to the protections that liberal societies give to conscientious dissent. This view reverses the standard liberal picture which sees private 'conscientious' objection as a modest act of personal belief and civil disobedience as a strategic, undemocratic act whose costs are only sometimes worth bearing. The conscience argument is narrower and shows that genuinely morally responsive civil disobedience honours the best of our moral responsibilities and is protected by a duty-based moral right of conscience. Part II translates the conviction argument and conscience argument into two legal defences. The first is a demands-of-conviction defence. The second is a necessity defence. Both of these defences apply more readily to civil disobedience than to private disobedience. Part II also examines lawful punishment, showing that, even when punishment is justifiable, civil disobedients have a moral right not to be punished.|
|Keywords||conscience conviction civil disobedience conscientious objection punishment|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael Martin (1990). Ecosabotage and Civil Disobedience. Environmental Ethics 12 (4):291-310.
Kimberley Brownlee (2004). Features of a Paradigm Case of Civil Disobedience. Res Publica 10 (4):337-351.
Vinit Haksar (1976). Rawls and Gandhi on Civil Disobedience. Inquiry 19 (1-4):151 – 192.
James F. Childress (1985). Civil Disobedience, Conscientious Objection, and Evasive Noncompliance: A Framework for the Analysis and Assessment of Illegal Actions in Health Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (1):63-84.
Jennifer Welchman (2001). Is Ecosabotage Civil Disobedience? Philosophy and Geography 4 (1):97 – 107.
Frank Schalow (1998). Language and the Social Roots of Conscience: Heidegger's Less Traveled Path. [REVIEW] Human Studies 21 (2):141-156.
Joseph Raz (1979). The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford University Press.
Brian Smart (1978). Defining Civil Disobedience. Inquiry 21 (1-4):249 – 269.
Peter Jones (2004). Introduction: Law and Disobedience. Res Publica 10 (4):319-336.
Fred R. Berger (1970). 'Law and Order' and Civil Disobedience. Inquiry 13 (1-4):254 – 273.
Brian J. Huschle (2002). Cyber Disobedience. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (1):69-83.
Kimberley Brownlee (2007). The Communicative Aspects of Civil Disobedience and Lawful Punishment. Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (2):179-192.
Jason Brennan (forthcoming). Why Liberal States Must Accommodate Tax Resistors. Public Affairs Quarterly.
Added to index2012-09-10
Total downloads17 ( #78,069 of 732,212 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,424 of 732,212 )
How can I increase my downloads?