David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 20:253-260 (2009)
This paper examines the controversial governance mechanism of classified boards. Classified board advocates believe that multiple year terms give directors a longer-term horizon. Shareholder activists push for declassifications of boards because they argue that agency problems are likely to arise. In a longitudinal study of six years of KLD, RiskMetrics and Compustat data, we test the influence of classified boards on social performance dimensions. We find that classified boards are negatively associated with social performance strengths in the areas of community and diversity, indicating that they are not proactive in these areas. However, classified boards are negatively associated with social performance concerns on five out of six dimensions, providing evidence that while these boards are not proactive in stakeholder management, neither are they harmful nor neglectful towards stakeholders. The overall findings suggest that classified boards may be associated with a stakeholder management philosophy of “do no harm.”
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paul Dunn & Barbara Sainty (2005). The Changing Composition of Canadian Boards of Directors. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:230-233.
Victoria B. McWilliams (2008). The Ethical Implications of Ignoring Shareholder Directives to Remove Antitakeover Provisions. Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (3):321-346.
Zena Burgess & Phyllis Tharenou (2002). Women Board Directors: Characteristics of the Few. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 37 (1):39 - 49.
Siri Terjesen & Val Singh (2008). Female Presence on Corporate Boards: A Multi-Country Study of Environmental Context. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 83 (1):55 - 63.
Shawn D. Howton, Shelly W. Howton & Victoria B. McWilliams (2008). The Ethical Implications of Ignoring Shareholder Directives to Remove Antitakeover Provisions. Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (3):321-346.
Colin Coulson-Thomas (2007). SME Directors and Boards: The Contribution of Directors and Boards to the Growth and Development of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs). International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (3):250-261.
Victor Dulewicz & Peter Herbert (2008). Current Practice of FTSE 350 Boards Concerning the Appointment, Evaluation and Development of Directors, Boards and Committees Post the Combined Code. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 4 (1):99-115.
Coral B. Ingley (2008). Company Growth and Board Attitudes to Corporate Social Responsibility. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 4 (1):17-39.
Jia Wang & H. Dudley Dewhirst (1992). Boards of Directors and Stakeholder Orientation. Journal of Business Ethics 11 (2):115 - 123.
Robert J. Williams (2003). Women on Corporate Boards of Directors and Their Influence on Corporate Philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics 42 (1):1 - 10.
Deborah E. Arfken, Stephanie L. Bellar & Marilyn M. Helms (2004). The Ultimate Glass Ceiling Revisited: The Presence of Women on Corporate Boards. Journal of Business Ethics 50 (2):177-186.
David Weitzner & Theo Peridis (2011). Corporate Governance as Part of the Strategic Process: Rethinking the Role of the Board. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 102 (S1):33-42.
E. Harrison (1924). A Classified Catalogue of the Books, Pamphlets, and Maps in the Library of the Societies for the Promotion of Hellenic and Roman Studies. 4to. Pp. Xvi + 336. London: Macmillan, 1924. Boards, 15s. 6d. Net (to Members of Either Society, 7s. 6d.). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 38 (7-8):213-.
Ruth Mateos de Cabo, Ricardo Gimeno & María J. Nieto (2012). Gender Diversity on European Banks' Boards of Directors. Journal of Business Ethics 109 (2):145-162.
David B. Resnik (2005). Using Electronic Discussion Boards to Teach Responsible Conduct of Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (4):617-630.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads1 ( #514,805 of 1,692,510 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #181,267 of 1,692,510 )
How can I increase my downloads?