Conscientious refusal by physicians and pharmacists: Who is obligated to do what, and why?

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3):187-200 (2008)
Abstract
Some medical services have long generated deep moral controversy within the medical profession as well as in broader society and have led to conscientious refusals by some physicians to provide those services to their patients. More recently, pharmacists in a number of states have refused on grounds of conscience to fill legal prescriptions for their customers. This paper assesses these controversies. First, I offer a brief account of the basis and limits of the claim to be free to act on one’s conscience. Second, I sketch an account of the basis of the medical and pharmacy professions’ responsibilities and the process by which they are specified and change over time. Third, I then set out and defend what I call the “conventional compromise” as a reasonable accommodation to conflicts between these professions’ responsibilities and the moral integrity of their individual members. Finally, I take up and reject the complicity objection to the conventional compromise. Put together, this provides my answer to the question posed in the title of my paper: “Conscientious refusal by physicians and pharmacists: who is obligated to do what, and why?”.
Keywords Conscience  Complicity  Ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,322
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Azgad Gold (2010). Physicians' “Right of Conscience”- Beyond Politics. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (1):134-142.
Patrick Clipsham (2013). Comparing Policies on Conscientious Refusals: A Feminist Perspective. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 6 (1):159-165.
Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

72 ( #18,226 of 1,096,504 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #34,641 of 1,096,504 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.