David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3):187-200 (2008)
Some medical services have long generated deep moral controversy within the medical profession as well as in broader society and have led to conscientious refusals by some physicians to provide those services to their patients. More recently, pharmacists in a number of states have refused on grounds of conscience to fill legal prescriptions for their customers. This paper assesses these controversies. First, I offer a brief account of the basis and limits of the claim to be free to act on one’s conscience. Second, I sketch an account of the basis of the medical and pharmacy professions’ responsibilities and the process by which they are specified and change over time. Third, I then set out and defend what I call the “conventional compromise” as a reasonable accommodation to conflicts between these professions’ responsibilities and the moral integrity of their individual members. Finally, I take up and reject the complicity objection to the conventional compromise. Put together, this provides my answer to the question posed in the title of my paper: “Conscientious refusal by physicians and pharmacists: who is obligated to do what, and why?”.
|Keywords||Conscience Complicity Ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
A. Ravelingien, J. Braeckman, L. Crevits, D. De Ridder & E. Mortier (2009). 'Cosmetic Neurology' and the Moral Complicity Argument. Neuroethics 2 (3):151-162.
Azgad Gold (2010). Physicians' “Right of Conscience”- Beyond Politics. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (1):134-142.
Patrick Clipsham (2013). Comparing Policies on Conscientious Refusals: A Feminist Perspective. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 6 (1):159-165.
R. D. Orr (2012). The Physician's Right of Refusal: What Are the Limits? Christian Bioethics 18 (1):30-40.
Jerome R. Wernow & Chris Gastmans (2010). A Review and Taxonomy of Argument-Based Ethics Literature Regarding Conscientious Objections to End-of-Life Procedures. Christian Bioethics 16 (3):274-295.
Similar books and articles
Eva LaFollette & Hugh LaFollette (2007). Private Conscience, Public Acts. Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (5):249-254.
J. C. Parker (2011). Conscience and Collective Duties: Do Medical Professionals Have a Collective Duty to Ensure That Their Profession Provides Non-Discriminatory Access to All Medical Services? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (1):28-52.
Robert F. Card (2007). Conscientious Objection and Emergency Contraception. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (6):8 – 14.
Gerald Logue (1994). Toleration of Moral Diversity and the Conscientious Refusal by Physicians to Withdraw Life-Sustaining Treatment. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (2):147-159.
John K. Davis (2004). Conscientious Refusal and a Doctors's Right to Quit. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (1):75 – 91.
Mark R. Wicclair (2011). Conscientious Objection in Health Care: An Ethical Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Carolyn McLeod (2010). An Institutional Solution to Conflicts of Conscience in Medicine. Hastings Center Report 40 (6):41-42.
Mark R. Wicclair (2006). Pharmacies, Pharmacists, and Conscientious Objection. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (3):225-250.
Elizabeth Fenton & Loren Lomasky (2005). Dispensing with Liberty: Conscientious Refusal and the "Morning-After Pill". Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (6):579 – 592.
Zuzana Deans (2013). Conscientious Objections in Pharmacy Practice in Great Britain. Bioethics 27 (1):48-57.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads75 ( #21,108 of 1,140,334 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #60,710 of 1,140,334 )
How can I increase my downloads?