Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (3):659-676 (2000)
|Abstract||Following Burge, many anti-individualists suppose that a subject can possess a concept even if she incompletely understands it. While agreeing that this is possible, I argue that there is a limit on the extent to which a subject can incompletely understand the set of concepts she thinks with. This limit derives from our conception of our ability to reflectively evaluate our own thoughts or, as Burge puts it, our ability to engage in critical reasoning. The paper extends Burge's own work on critical reasoning. He argued that critical reasoning imposes a limit on the extent to which we can be mistaken about what thoughts we are having; in general, we can know non-empirically what we are thinking (Burge, "Our Entitlement to Self-Knowledge", Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society XCVI, 1996). He does not explicitly consider whether critical reasoning also imposes a limit on incomplete understanding of thoughts|
|Keywords||Epistemology Reasoning Self-knowledge Understanding Burge, T|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Wanda Teays (2009). Second Thoughts: Critical Thinking for a Diverse Society. Mcgraw-Hill Higher Education.
Matthew Allen (2004). Smart Thinking: Skills for Critical Understanding and Writing. Oxford University Press.
J. B. Cederblom (2012). Critical Reasoning: Understanding and Criticizing Arguments and Theories. Cengage.
Mark Eli Kalderon (2001). Reasoning and Representing. Philosophical Studies 105 (2):129-160.
Tyler Burge (2003). Logic and Analyticity. Grazer Philosophische Studien 66 (1):199-249.
Halvor Nordby (2004). Incorrect Understanding and Concept Possession. Philosophical Explorations 7 (1):55-70.
Huiming Ren (2009). Entitlement to Self-Knowledge and Brute Error. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (4):543 – 562.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads64 ( #14,325 of 549,065 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,065 )
How can I increase my downloads?