Do Higher-Order Music Ontologies Rest on a Mistake?

British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (2):169-184 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recent work in the ontology of music suggests that we will avoid confusion if we distinguish between two kinds of question that are typically posed in music ontology. Thus, a distinction has been made between fundamental ontology and higher-order ontology. The former addresses questions about the basic metaphysical options from which ontologists choose. For instance, are musical works types, indicated types, classes of particulars, or some other kind of entity? Higher-order ontology addresses the question of what lies ‘at the centre’ of a specific form of music, such as rock or jazz—or perhaps classical music. The argument of this essay is, first, that a close examination of the best efforts in two of these territories shows that they have the effect of pressing the music in each sphere into implausible Procrustean beds. Second, it is argued that the general question that higher-order ontologies pose, that is, ‘What work-kind is it that lies at the centre of a given kind of music, F?’ is a question based on a mistaken but seductive assumption, namely that the concept of the work of F has actual application. In fact, these concepts—upon which higher-order ontology depends—are mere artefacts of philosophy. The question is also addressed why the assumption is so seductive. Finally, the question finally is posed about what, if anything, is implied from the foregoing about the traditional ontology of classical music

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The ontology of musical works: A philosophical pseudo-problem.James O. Young - 2011 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (2):284-297.
Music & meaning.Jenefer Robinson (ed.) - 1997 - Ithaca [N.Y.]: Cornell University Press.
The philosophy of music.Andrew Kania - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Musical works: Ontology and meta-ontology.Julian Dodd - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (6):1113-1134.
Music Without Metaphysics?Christopher Bartel - 2011 - British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (4):383-398.
In Defence of Higher-Order Musical Ontology: A Reply to Lee B. Brown.A. Kania - 2012 - British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (1):97-102.
Music.Nicholas Cook - 2010 - New York, NY: Sterling.
Moribund music: can classical music be saved?Carolyn Beckingham - 2009 - Portland: Sussex Academic Press.
The concept of music.Robin Maconie - 1990 - Oxford [England]: Clarendon Press.
Music & ministry: a biblical counterpoint.Calvin M. Johansson - 1984 - Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson Publishers.
Musik und Zeit bei Kant.Susanne Herrmann-Sinai - 2009 - Kant Studien 100 (4):427-453.
The musical work: reality or invention?Michael Talbot (ed.) - 2000 - Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-04-15

Downloads
112 (#145,653)

6 months
4 (#315,466)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Intuitions in the Ontology of Musical Works.Elzė Sigutė Mikalonytė - 2022 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 13 (2):455-474.
A Return to Musical Idealism.Wesley D. Cray & Carl Matheson - 2017 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95 (4):702-715.
The philosophy of music.Andrew Kania - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Jazz and Musical Works: Hypnotized by the Wrong Model.John Andrew Fisher - 2018 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 76 (2):151-162.
In Defence of Higher-Order Musical Ontology: A Reply to Lee B. Brown.A. Kania - 2012 - British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (1):97-102.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references