David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (2):265-303 (2011)
While he was in the employ of the Elector of Mainz, between 1668 and 1671, Leibniz produced a series of important studies in natural law. One of these, dated between 1670 and 1671, is especially noteworthy since it contains Leibniz's earliest sustained attempt to develop an account of justice. Central to this account is the notion of what Leibniz would later come to call `disinterested love', a notion that remained essentially unchanged in Leibniz's work from this period to the end of his life. Through his notion of disinterested love, Leibniz sought to resolve the supposed conflict between self- and other-regarding motives. For a variety of reasons, many commentators have failed to understand the basis of Leibniz's proposed resolution. My purpose in the present paper is to clarify the terms in which Leibniz effected this resolution, as well as to point out important developments in his later thought concerning the relation between pleasure, good, and happiness
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Christopher Johns (2013). Leibniz, Pufendorf, and the Possibility of Moral Self-Governance. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (2):281 - 301.
Julia Jorati (2014). Leibniz's Twofold Gap Between Moral Knowledge and Motivation. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (4):748-766.
Similar books and articles
David Sanderlin (1993). Charity According to St. John of the Cross: A Disinterested Love for Interesting Special Relationships, Including Marriage. Journal of Religious Ethics 21 (1):87 - 115.
Stephen Post (1986). Disinterested Benevolence: An American Debate Over the Nature of Christian Love. Journal of Religious Ethics 14 (2):356 - 368.
Michael J. Murray (2002). Leibniz's Proposal for Theological Reconciliation Among the Protestants. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (4):623-646.
Harry Frankfurt (2001). The Dear Self. Philosophers' Imprint 1 (1):1-14.
Gary Foster (2009). Bestowal Without Appraisal: Problems in Frankfurt's Characterization of Love and Personal Identity. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (2):153 - 168.
Frederick R. Bauer (2004). The Essence of Ethics. Ambassador Books, Inc..
Simon May (2011). Love: A History. Yale University Press.
Simon May (2011). Love: A Secret History. Yale University Press.
Bennett W. Helm, Love. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Sharon Krishek (2008). Two Forms of Love: The Problem of Preferential Love in Kierkegaard's Works of Love. Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (4):595-617.
Paul M. Hughes (2001). Moral Atrocity and Political Reconciliation. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (1):123-133.
Gregory Brown (1995). Miracles in the Best of All Possible Worlds: Leibniz's Dilemma and Leibniz's Razor. History of Philosophy Quarterly 12 (1):19-39.
Added to index2011-04-08
Total downloads21 ( #134,721 of 1,724,852 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #349,138 of 1,724,852 )
How can I increase my downloads?