Synthese 169 (2):351 - 369 (2009)
|Abstract||The aim of the work is to provide a language to reason about Closed Interactions, i.e. all those situations in which the outcomes of an interaction can be determined by the agents themselves and in which the environment cannot interfere with they are able to determine. We will see that two different interpretations can be given of this restriction, both stemming from Pauly Representation Theorem. We will identify such restrictions and axiomatize their logic. We will apply the formal tools to reason about games and their regulation.|
|Keywords||Cooperative Game Theory Logic Closed Interaction|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John Mccarthy (1997). Modality, Si! Modal Logic, No! Studia Logica 59 (1):29-32.
Petr Hájek & Vítězslav Švejdar (1991). A Note on the Normal Form of Closed Formulas of Interpretability Logic. Studia Logica 50 (1):25 - 28.
Robert Rose, Matthias Scheutz & Paul Schermerhorn (2010). Towards a Conceptual and Methodological Framework for Determining Robot Believability. Interaction Studies 11 (2):314-335.
Eric Rosen (1997). Modal Logic Over Finite Structures. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 6 (4):427-439.
Marc Pauly & Rohit Parikh (2003). Game Logic - an Overview. Studia Logica 75 (2):165 - 182.
Robert Goldblatt (2001). Quasi-Modal Equivalence of Canonical Structures. Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (2):497-508.
Added to index2009-04-27
Total downloads7 ( #142,233 of 722,745 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?