Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (2):127-139 (2000)
|Abstract||The use of biotechnology in food productiongives rise to consumer concerns. The term ``consumerconcern'' is often used as a container notion. Itincludes concerns about food safety, environmental andanimal welfare consequences of food productionsystems, and intrinsic moral objections againstgenetic modification. In order to create clarity adistinction between three different kinds of consumerconcern is proposed. Consumer concerns can be seen assigns of loss of trust. Maintaining consumer trustasks for governmental action. Towards consumerconcerns, governments seem to have limitedpossibilities for public policy. Under current WTOregulations designed to prevent trade disputes,governments can only limit their policies to 1) safetyregulation based upon sound scientific evidence and 2)the stimulation of a system of product labeling. Ananalysis of trust, however, can show that ifgovernments limit their efforts in this way, they willnot do enough to avoid the types of consumer concernsthat diminish trust. The establishment of a technicalbody for food safety – although perhaps necessary –is in itself not enough, because concerns that relatedirectly to food safety cannot be solved by ``pure''science alone. And labeling can only be a good way totake consumer concerns seriously if these concerns arerelated to consumer autonomy. For consumer concernsthat are linked to ideas about a good society,labeling can only provide a solution if it is seen asan addition to political action rather than as itssubstitution. Labeling can help consumers take uptheir political responsibility. As citizens, consumershave certain reasonable concerns that can justifiableinfluence the market. In a free-market society, theyare, as buyers, co-creators of the market, andsocietal steering is partly done by the market.Therefore, they need the information to co-create thatmarket. The basis of labeling in these cases, however,is not the good life of the individual but thepolitical responsibility people have in their role asparticipants in a free-market. Then, public concernsare taken seriously. Labeling in that case does nottake away the possibilities of reaching politicalgoals, but it adds a possibility.|
|Keywords||WTO consumer concerns trust Olli Lagerspetz food ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Unni Kjærnes (2012). Ethics and Action: A Relational Perspective on Consumer Choice in the European Politics of Food. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (2):145-162.
Franck L. B. Meijboom, Tatjana Visak & Frans W. A. Brom (2006). From Trust to Trustworthiness: Why Information is Not Enough in the Food Sector. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (5):427-442.
Paul Weirich (ed.) (2008). Labeling Genetically Modified Food: The Philosophical and Legal Debate. OUP USA.
Michiel Korthals (2001). Taking Consumers Seriously: Two Concepts of Consumer Sovereignty. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2):201-215.
Johan de Tavernier (2012). Food Citizenship: Is There a Duty for Responsible Consumption? [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (6):895-907.
Alan Rubel & Robert Streiffer (2005). Respecting the Autonomy of European and American Consumers: Defending Positive Labels on Gm Foods. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (1):75-84.
Michele Graffeo, Lucia Savadori, Katya Tentori, Nicolao Bonini & Rino Rumiati (2009). Consumer Decision in the Context of a Food Hazard: The Effect of Commitment. [REVIEW] Mind and Society 8 (1):59-76.
Klaus Peter Rippe (2000). Novel Foods and Consumer Rights: Concerning Food Policy in a Liberal State. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (1):71-80.
Volkert Beekman (2008). Consumer Rights to Informed Choice on the Food Market. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (1):61 - 72.
Renee B. Kim (2009). Meeting Consumer Concerns for Food Safety in South Korea: The Importance of Food Safety and Ethics in a Globalizing Market. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (2):141-152.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #90,833 of 756,449 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,427 of 756,449 )
How can I increase my downloads?