Funding, objectivity and the socialization of medical research
Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):295--308 (2002)
| Abstract | There has been a sharp rise in private funding of medical research, especially in relation to patentable products. Several serious problems with this are described. A solution involving the elimination of patents and public funding administered through extended national health care systems is proposed. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesC. A. Gericke (2005). Ethical Issues in Funding Orphan Drug Research and Development. Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (3):164-168.
Heidi Kjærnet (2010). At Arm's Length? Applied Social Science and its Sponsors. Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (3):161-169.
Jeanne Salmon Freeman (1996). Arguing Along the Slippery Slope of Human Embryo Research. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (1):61-81.
Brian Schrag, Gloria Ferrell, Vivian Weil, Tristan J. Fiedler, Gloria Ferrell, Vivian Weil & Tristan J. Fiedler (2003). Barking Up the Wrong Tree? Industry Funding of Academic Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (4):569-582.
Carl M. Skooglund & Steven P. Nichols (1998). Friend or Foe: A Brief Examination of the Ethics of Corporate Sponsored Research at Universities. Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (3):385-390.
Simone van der Burg (2011). Taking the “Soft Impacts” of Technology Into Account: Broadening the Discourse in Research Practice. Social Epistemology 23 (3):301-316.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads13 ( #88,037 of 549,754 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,754 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
