David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Review of Metaphysics 60 (3):597-642 (2006)
Commentators have long agreed that Wodeham’s account of objects of judgment is highly innovative, but they have continued to disagree about its proper interpretation. Some read him as introducing items that are merely supervenient on (and nothing in addition to) Aristotelian substances and accidents; others take him to be introducing a new type of entity in addition to substances and accidents—namely, abstract states of affairs. In this paper, I argue that both interpretations are mistaken: the entities Wodeham introduces are really distinct from substances and accidents, but, like substances and accidents, they are concrete (rather than abstract). Moreover, the key to understanding the significance of his theory, I contend, lies in a proper understanding of the theoretical role these entities play in his theory of judgment.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ari Maunu (2004). Leibnizian Soft Reduction of Extrinsic Denominations and Relations. Synthese 139 (1):143-164.
Edith Dudley Sylla (1998). God, Indivisibles, and Logic in the Later Middle Ages: Adam Wodeham's Response to Henry of Harclay. Medieval Philosophy and Theology 7 (01):69-87.
Dominik Perler (2005). Emotions and Cognitions. Fourteenth-Century Discussions on the Passions of the Soul. Vivarium 43 (2):250-274.
Fabrizio Amerini (2006). Utrum Inhaerentia Sit de Essentia Accidentis. Francis of Marchia and the Debate on the Nature of Accidents. Vivarium 44 (1):96-150.
Elizabeth Karger (1995). William of Ockham, Walter Chatton and Adam Wodeham on the Objects of Knowledge and Belief. Vivarium 33 (2):171-196.
Susan Brower-Toland (2007). Ockham on Judgment, Concepts, and the Problem of Intentionality. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (1):67-110.
Barry Smith (1997). On Substances, Accidents and Universals: In Defence of a Constituent Ontology. Philosophical Papers 26 (1):105-127.
Susan Brower-Toland (forthcoming). How Chatton Changed Ockham's Mind: William Ockham and Walter Chatton on Objects and Acts of Judgment. In G. Klima (ed.), Intentionality, Cognition and Mental Representation in Medieval Philosophy. Fordham University Press.
Susan Brower-Toland (2007). Facts Vs. Things: Adam Wodeham and the Later Medieval Debate About Objects of Judgment. Review of Metaphysics 60 (3):597-642.
Added to index2009-08-06
Total downloads28 ( #62,358 of 1,101,672 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #116,934 of 1,101,672 )
How can I increase my downloads?