Is "Goodness" a Name of a Simple Non-Natural Quality?
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 34:249 - 268 (1933)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesChristine M. Korsgaard (2011). Natural Goodness, Rightness, and the Intersubjectivity of Reason: Reply to Arroyo, Cummiskey, Moland, and Bird-Pollan. Metaphilosophy 42 (4):381-394.
G. E. Moore, H. W. B. Joseph & A. E. Taylor (1932). Symposium: Is Goodness a Quality? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 11:116 - 168.
Barnett Savery (1937). The "Unique" Quality Goodness -- A Myth. International Journal of Ethics 47 (2):210-223.
Mike Lukich (2002). “Non-Natural” Qualities in G.E. Moore: Inherent or Contingent? Philosophical Studies 108 (1-2):15 - 21.
Mark C. Murphy (2003). Philippa Foot, Natural Goodness:Natural Goodness. Ethics 113 (2):410-414.
Erling Skorpen (1966). Goodness is Non-Natural and Simple. Southern Journal of Philosophy 4 (1):14-26.
Mark Wynn (1999). Natural Theology In an Ecological Mode. Faith and Philosophy 16 (1):27-42.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads13 ( #89,098 of 556,840 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,840 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
