Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (1):1-37 (2006)
|Abstract||: In the development of biotechnology in the United States, many questions were raised about the appropriateness of applying to this area a traditional robust system of intellectual property rights. Despite these hesitations, the U.S. rejected suggested modifications. This was a mistake, and there is a need to develop a modified system that promotes more of the relevant ethical values|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Peter Lewin (2007). Creativity or Coercion: Alternative Perspectives on Rights to Intellectual Property. Journal of Business Ethics 71 (4):441 - 455.
Alex Rosenberg (2004). On the Priority of Intellectual Property Rights, Especially in Biotechnology. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (1):77-95.
Baruch A. Brody (2010). Traditional Knowledge and Intellectual Property. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20 (3):231-249.
Francis Gurry (2005). The Growing Complexity of International Policy in Intellectual Property. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (1).
D. B. Resnik (2003). A Pluralistic Account of Intellectual Property. Journal of Business Ethics 46 (4):319 - 335.
Baruch A. Brody (2007). Intellectual Property and Biotechnology: The European Debate. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (2):69-110.
Baruch A. Brody (2010). Intellectual Property, State Sovereignty, and Biotechnology. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20 (1):pp. 51-73.
David W. Opderbeck, A Virtue-Centered Approach to the Biotechnology Commons (or, the Virtuous Penguin).
Baruch A. Brody (2006). Intellectual Property and Biotechnology: The U.S. Internal Experience--Part II. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (2):105-128.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #56,103 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?