In Andrew Brook, Don Ross & David L. Thompson (eds.), Dennett's Philosophy: A Comprehensive Assessment. MIT Press (2000)
|Abstract||Now that some years have passed, how does this picture of consciousness look? On the one hand, Dennett's work has vastly expanded the range of options for thinking about conscious experiences and conscious subjects. On the other hand, I suspect that the implications of his picture have been oversold (perhaps more by others than by Dennett himself). The rhetoric of _CE_ is radical in places but I do not sure that the actual implications for commonsense views of Seemings and Subjects are nearly as radical.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jesse Steinberg, Weak Motivational Internalism Lite: Dispositions, Moral Judgments, and What We're Motivated to Do.
William E. Seager (1993). Verification, Skepticism, and Consciousness. Inquiry 36 (1-2):113-133.
Juan José Acero (2002). La Conciencia Explicada Por Dennett. Theoria 17 (1):81-112.
Kathleen Akins (1996). Lost the Plot? Reconstructing Dennett's Multiple Drafts Theory of Consciousness. Mind and Language 11 (1):1-43.
S. J. Todd (2006). Unmasking Multiple Drafts. Philosophical Psychology 19 (4):477-494.
Michael Lockwood (1993). Dennett's Mind. Inquiry 36 (1-2):59-72.
Robert Kirk (1993). "The Best Set of Tools"? Dennett's Metaphors and the Mind-Body Problem. Philosophical Quarterly 44 (172):335-43.
David M. Rosenthal (1995). Multiple Drafts and the Facts of the Matter. In Thomas Metzinger (ed.), Conscious Experience. Ferdinand Schoningh.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #83,035 of 549,013 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?