Laws impressed on matter by the Creator'? : the Origin and the question of religion
In Michael Ruse & Robert J. Richards (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the "Origin of Species". Cambridge University Press (2009)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper '+r+'').show() })">Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,711 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMarkus Schrenk (2003). Real Ceteris Paribus Laws. In R. Bluhm & C. Nimtz (eds.), Proceedings of GAP.5, Bielefeld 2003. mentis.
Markus Schrenk (2007). Can Capacities Rescue Us From Ceteris Paribus Laws? In B. Gnassounou & M. Kistler (eds.), Dispositions in Philosophy and Science. Ashgate.
Attila Grandpierre (2002). The Fundamental Principles of Existence and the Origin of Physical Laws. Ultimate Reality and Meaning 25 (2):127-147.
L. L. Pimenoff (1918). Mind, the Creator of Matter. The Monist 28 (2):209-233.
Denis O'Brien (1999). La Matière Chez Plotin: Son Origine, Sa Nature. Phronesis 44 (1):45-71.
Denis O'Brien (1999). La Matière Chez Plotin: Son Origine, Sa Nature. Phronesis 44 (1):45-71.
Alexander Bird (2002). On Whether Some Laws Are Necessary. Analysis 62 (3):257–270.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-09-15Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
