The Leibniz Review 10:21-51 (2000)
|Abstract||One argument that Leibniz employed to rule out the possibility of a world soul appears to turn on the assumption that the very notion of an infinite number or of an infinite whole is inconsistent. This argument was considered in a series of three papers published in The Leibniz Review: in the first, by Laurence Carlin, the argument was delineated and analyzed; in the second, by myself, the argument was criticized and rejected; in the third, by Richard Arthur, an attempt was made to defend Leibniz’s argument against my criticisms. In the present paper, I take up the matter again in an attempt to clarify the issues involved and to defend my original criticisms of the argument against the objections raised by Arthur|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Richard Arthur (2001). Leibniz on Infinite Number, Infinite Wholes, and the Whole World. The Leibniz Review 11:103-116.
Richard Arthur (1999). Infinite Number and the World Soul; in Defence of Carlin and Leibniz. The Leibniz Review 9:105-116.
Paul Lodge & Stephen Puryear (2006). Unconscious Conceiving and Leibniz's Argument for Primitive Concepts. Studia Leibnitiana 38 (2):177 - 196.
Ohad Nachtomy (2005). Leibniz on the Greatest Number and the Greatest Being. The Leibniz Review 15:49-66.
Ohad Nachtomy (2011). A Tale of Two Thinkers, One Meeting, and Three Degrees of Infinity: Leibniz and Spinoza (1675–8). British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (5):935-961.
Mogens Lærke (2011). Leibniz's Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (1):58-84.
Richard Arthur (1998). Infinite Aggregates and Phenomenal Wholes. The Leibniz Review 8:25-45.
Mark van Atten (2011). A Note on Leibniz's Argument Against Infinite Wholes. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (1):121-129.
Stewart Duncan (2010). Leibniz on Hobbes's Materialism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (1):11-18.
Mogens Laerke (2011). Leibniz's Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God. Archiv Fuer Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (1):58 - 84.
Scuola Normale Superiore (2010). Leibniz and 'Bradley's Regress'. The Leibniz Review 20:1-12.
David Werther (1996). Leibniz and the Possibility of God's Existence. Religious Studies 32 (1):37 - 48.
Laurence Carlin (1997). Infinite Accumulations and Pantheistic Implications. The Leibniz Review 7:1-24.
Stewart Duncan (2012). Leibniz's Mill Arguments Against Materialism. Philosophical Quarterly 62 (247):250-72.
Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra & Paul Lodge (2011). Infinite Analysis, Lucky Proof, and Guaranteed Proof in Leibniz. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (2):222-236.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads7 ( #142,359 of 722,932 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,932 )
How can I increase my downloads?