Moogles, and Chocobos, and Kripke? Oh My! Some Basic Issues in Contemporary Philosophy of Language, Kupo!
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Originally Written for Final Fantasy And Philosophy (ed.), but will remain unpublished (2008)
Everyone knows that moogles are disgustingly cute. I know people who would kill to be able to have one in real life, but could there really be moogles? Say, for instance, that archeologists discovered a species of animal in some remote land that completely resembled the chocobo in every way.Â Would that count as discovering that the beloved Final Fantasy creatures were real? Even if we donâ€™t make such a discovery are chocobos and moogles metaphysically possible? That is, can we coherently imagine a situation which would count as one which contained moogles? The answer to these questions depends, surprisingly, on what the meaning of â€˜moogleâ€™ and â€˜chocoboâ€™ is; or so many contemporary philosophers of language think. In particular one contemporary philosopher, Saul Kripke (1940- ), has argued that the answer to both of these questions is a resounding no. In order to understand why he thinks this and whether he is right weâ€™ll have to begin by looking at the debate philosophers have had over the meaning of names.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John A. Humphrey (1996). Kripke's Wittgenstein and the Impossibility of Private Language: The Same Old Story? Journal of Philosophical Research 21 (January):197-207.
Jaroslav Peregrin, Scott Soames, Beyond Rigidity, The Unfinished Semantic Agenda of Naming and Necessity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, Ix + 379 Pp. [REVIEW]
Bryan Frances (2011). Kripke. In Barry Lee (ed.), Key Thinkers in the Philosophy of Language. Continuum.
Paweł Grabarczyk (2003). Czy Saul Kripke mógłby być fenomenologiem? Filozofia Nauki 1.
Baruch A. Brody (1979). Kripke on Proper Names. In A. French Peter, E. Uehling Theodore, Howard Jr & K. Wettstein (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language. University of Minnesota Press. 64-69.
Hans-Johann Glock (2003). Quine and Davidson on Language, Thought, and Reality. Cambridge University Press.
Michael E. Levin (1975). Kripke's Argument Against the Identity Thesis. Journal of Philosophy 72 (March):149-67.
Paul Coates (1995). Kripke's Skeptical Paradox: Normativeness and Meaning. Mind 1986 (January):77-80.
Richard Heck (ed.) (1997). Language, Thought, and Logic: Essays in Honour of Michael Dummett. Oxford University Press.
Alan Berger (ed.) (2011). Saul Kripke. Cambridge University Press.
Paul Horwich (1990). Wittgenstein and Kripke on the Nature of Meaning. Mind and Language 5 (2):105-121.
Michael Scott (2010). Religious Language. Philosophy Compass 5 (6):505-515.
Paul A. Boghossian (1989). The Rule-Following Considerations. Mind 98 (392):507-49.
Dan Barbiero (1996). Chomsky V. Kripke, Round Two: Methodological Collecttivism and Explanatory Adequacy. Wittgenstein Studien 3 (2).
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads28 ( #66,371 of 1,101,646 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #91,692 of 1,101,646 )
How can I increase my downloads?