Graduate studies at Western
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2 (2):145-153 (1987)
|Abstract||Alarmed by Three Mile Island, Love Canal, and other disastrous deployments of new technologies, the public is demanding more voice in the decision-making on technology. To make this possible, it is proposed that metatechnology be evolved that will provide a practical technology for the safe, effective, and economical use of technology. A case history of a specific metatechnology is presented. Here the metatechnology enabled a realistic balancing of the benefits of mass screening of women by mammography against the hazards from the X-rays. By showing that the screening of women under 50 was counterproductive, this metatechnology helped to ban such screening in a program involving a quarter of a million women. The strategic mistake in setting up this and other technological programs was that the decisions were made by the technologists. They benefited the technologists but were not beneficial to the women. One of the potentials of metatechnology is that in its fully computerized versions it could be used directly by the public for decision-making on the deployment of technologies.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Luciano Floridi (2011). Energy, Risks, and Metatechnology. Philosophy and Technology 24 (2):89-94.
Rogene A. Buchholz & Sandra B. Rosenthal (2002). Technology and Business: Rethinking the Moral Dilemma. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 41 (1-2):45 - 50.
Chris Gastmans (ed.) (2002). Between Technology and Humanity: The Impact of Technology on Health Care Ethics. Leuven University Press.
Janet Malek (2006). Identity, Harm, and the Ethics of Reproductive Technology. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (1):83 – 95.
Nathaniel Logar (2009). Towards a Culture of Application: Science and Decision Making at the National Institute of Standards & Technology. [REVIEW] Minerva 47 (4):345-366.
Marianne Boenink (2012). Debating the Desirability of New Biomedical Technologies: Lessons From the Introduction of Breast Cancer Screening in the Netherlands. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 20 (1):84-102.
Robert H. Blank (1982). Public Policy Implications of Human Genetic Technology: Genetic Screening. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (4):355-374.
Shiu-Wan Hung & Shih-Chang Tseng (2010). A New Framework Integrating Environmental Effects Into Technology Evaluation. Journal of Business Ethics 95 (4):543 - 556.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #292,723 of 739,390 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,390 )
How can I increase my downloads?