Margaret Cavendish and Joseph Glanvill: science, religion, and witchcraft

Abstract
Many scholars point to the close association between early modern science and the rise of rational arguments in favour of the existence of witches. For some commentators, it is a poor reflection on science that its methods so easily lent themselves to the unjust persecution of innocent men and women. In this paper, I examine a debate about witches between a woman philosopher, Margaret Cavendish , and a fellow of the Royal Society, Joseph Glanvill . I argue that Cavendish is the voice of reason in this exchange—not because she supports the modern-day view that witches do not exist, but because she shows that Glanvill’s arguments about witches betray his own scientific principles. Cavendish’s responses to Glanvill suggest that, when applied consistently, the principles of early modern science could in fact promote a healthy scepticism toward the existence of witches.Keywords: Margaret Cavendish; Joseph Glanvill; Witches; Inference to the best explanation; Anti-dogmatism; Religion
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 12,986
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 7 references

Citations of this work BETA
Jacqueline Broad (2011). Is Margaret Cavendish Worthy of Study Today? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (3):457-461.
Similar books and articles
Jacqueline Broad (2011). Is Margaret Cavendish Worthy of Study Today? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (3):457-461.
Eric Lewis (2001). The Legacy of Margaret Cavendish. Perspectives on Science 9 (3):341-365.
Kourken Michaelian (2009). Margaret Cavendish's Epistemology. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (1):31 – 53.
Deborah Boyle (2013). Margaret Cavendish. Philosophers' Magazine 60 (-1):63 - 65.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-09-27

Total downloads

14 ( #129,155 of 1,410,009 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #107,760 of 1,410,009 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.