On Whether Aquinas’s Ipsum Esse Is “Platonism”

Review of Metaphysics 60 (2):269-303 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Enrico Berti and others hold that Aquinas’s notion of God as ipsum esse subsistens conflicts with Aristotle’s view that positing an Idea of being treats being as a genus and nullifies all differences. The paper first shows how one of Aquinas’s ways of distinguishing esse from essence supposes an intimate tie between a thing’s esse and its differentia. Then it argues that for Aquinas the (one) divine essence differs from the (manifold) “essence of esse.” God is his very esse. This somehow “contains” all esse, but it also transcends it, because although simple, it also “contains” all forms and differentiae.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Esse/Essentia Argument in Aquinas's De ente et essentia.Scott Charles MacDonald - 1984 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 22 (2):157-72.
Platonism and anti-Platonism in mathematics.Mark Balaguer - 1998 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Esse in the Metaphysics of Thomas Aquinas.J. Christopher Maloney - 1981 - New Scholasticism 55 (2):159-177.
Just what is full-blooded platonism?Greg Restall - 2003 - Philosophia Mathematica 11 (1):82--91.
Thomas Aquinas on Creatures as Causes of Esse.John F. Wippel - 2000 - International Philosophical Quarterly 40 (2):197-213.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
91 (#171,724)

6 months
3 (#439,232)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen L. Brock
University of Chicago

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references