Graduate studies at Western
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (2):161-180 (1997)
|Abstract||Everyone appreciates a clever mathematical picture, but the prevailing attitude is one of scepticism: diagrams, illustrations, and pictures prove nothing; they are psychologically important and heuristically useful, but only a traditional verbal/symbolic proof provides genuine evidence for a purported theorem. Like some other recent writers (Barwise and Etchemendy ; Shin ; and Giaquinto ) I take a different view and argue, from historical considerations and some striking examples, for a positive evidential role for pictures in mathematics.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
J. Folina (1999). Discussion. Pictures, Proofs, and 'Mathematical Practice': Reply to James Robert Brown. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (3):425-429.
Ladislav Kvasz (2000). Changes of Language in the Development of Mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica 8 (1):47-83.
Robert Hopkins (1997). Pictures and Beauty. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 97 (2):177–194.
Jessica Carter (2010). Diagrams and Proofs in Analysis. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):1 – 14.
James Robert Brown (1999). Philosophy of Mathematics: An Introduction to the World of Proofs and Pictures. Routledge.
John Mumma (2010). Proofs, Pictures, and Euclid. Synthese 175 (2):255 - 287.
Irina Starikova (2007). Picture-Proofs and Platonism. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 7 (1):81-92.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #51,760 of 739,174 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,174 )
How can I increase my downloads?