David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (2):267-282 (2006)
This essay is a critical investigation of Heidegger’s insistence on the absolute difference between philosophy, defined as fundamental ontology, and theology, understood as the “ontic” “science of faith.” Focusing primarily on two important works from 1927, “Phenomenology and Theology” and Being and Time, I argue that the distinction between the two disciplines begins to blur in light of the circular character of hermeneutical understanding as Heidegger himself describes it. Ontology, he concedes, has ontic roots in the authentic self-understanding of Dasein. I maintain that this understanding involves an interpretive decision that, lacking the pure phenomenological rationality Heidegger attributes to it, looks much like the faith he would banish from philosophy
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Brian Gregor (2007). Formal Indication, Philosophy, and Theology: Bonhoeffer's Critique of Heidegger. Faith and Philosophy 24 (2):185-202.
Matheson Russell (2011). Phenomenology and Theology: Situating Heidegger's Philosophy of Religion. Sophia 50 (4):641-655.
Kenneth J. Konyndyk (1995). Aquinas on Faith and Science. Faith and Philosophy 12 (1):3-21.
Frederic L. Bender (1984). Heidegger's Hermeneutical Grounding of Science. Philosophy Research Archives 10:203-238.
С.А Нижников (2008). Преобразование метафизики в творчестве и. канта и возможность веры. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 15:311-320.
Klaus Nürnberger (2010). Martin Luther's Experiential Theology as a Model for Faith-Science Relationships. Zygon 45 (1):127-148.
Matthew I. Burch (2009). The Twinkling of an Eye. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (2):219-238.
Callum David Scott, Fides Et Ratio : An Investigation Into the Relationship Between Science and Religion.
Trish Glazebrook (2000). Heidegger's Philosophy of Science. Fordham University Press.
Michael Naas (2009). Miracle and Machine: The Two Sources of Religion and Science in Derrida's "Faith and Knowledge". Research in Phenomenology 39 (2):184-203.
Robert S. Gall (2013). Faith in Doubt in the End. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 73 (1):29-38.
Hava Tirosh-Samuelson (2010). History and the Future of Science and Religion. Zygon 45 (2):448-461.
David Wisdo (2011). Michael Ruse on Science and Faith: Seeking Mutual Understanding. Zygon 46 (3):639-654.
Merold Westphal (2007). The Importance of Mystery for the Life of Faith. Faith and Philosophy 24 (4):367-384.
Jacob W. Neumann (2011). Critical Pedagogy and Faith. Educational Theory 61 (5):601-619.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads2 ( #398,323 of 1,410,122 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,589 of 1,410,122 )
How can I increase my downloads?