Satisficing rationality: In praise of folly [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Value Inquiry 26 (2):261-269 (1992)
|Abstract||From a psychological point of view, human wants and desires form a multitiered structure. If values are related in any way to human affectivity or desire - and this is something most maximizing theorists would certainly not dispute - then we are forced to recognize that human values also form a multi-tiered structure. Failure to appreciate this connection leads maximization theorists seriously astray, both in their interpretation of human behavior and in their postulates of rationality. Optimizing involves satisficing, not strictly maximization; satisficing is truly rational|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alex C. Michalos (1972). Rationality Between the Maximizers and the Satisficers. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1972:423 - 445.
Tim Mulgan (2006). SLOTE'S SATISFICING CONSEQUENTIALISM. Ratio 6 (2):121 - 134.
Stephen Kearns (2007). In Praise of Folly: A Reply to Blome-Tillmann. Analysis 67 (295):219–222.
Michael Byron (1998). Satisficing and Optimality. Ethics 109 (1):67-93.
Edmund Henden (2007). Is Genuine Satisficing Rational? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (4):339 - 352.
Andrea Wilson Nightingale (1993). The Folly of Praise: Plato's Critique of Encomiastic Discourse in the Lysis and Symposium. The Classical Quarterly 43 (01):112-.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #188,971 of 723,182 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?