Towards an aristotelean theory of scientific explanation

Philosophy of Science 39 (1):20-31 (1972)
In this paper, I consider a variety of objections against the covering-law model of scientific explanation, show that Aristotle was already aware of them and had solutions for them, and argue that these solutions are correct. These solutions involve the notions of nonHumean causality and of essential properties. There are a great many familiar objections, both methodological and epistemological, to introducing these concepts into the methodology of science, but I show that these objections are based upon misunderstandings of these concepts
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/288406
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,280
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
I. Halonen & J. Hintikka (2000). Aristotelian Explanations. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (1):125-136.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

28 ( #170,231 of 1,932,507 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #149,396 of 1,932,507 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.