David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Review 115 (2):259-262 (2006)
Each volume in this series of companions to major philosophers contains specially commissioned essays by an international team of scholars, together with a substantial bibliography, and will serve as a reference work for students and non-specialists. One aim of the series is to dispel the intimidation such readers often feel when faced with the work of a difficult and challenging thinker. John Duns Scotus (1265/6-1308) was (along with Aquinas and Ockham) one of the three principal figures in medieval philosophy and theology, with an influence on modern thought arguably even greater than that of Aquinas. The essays in this volume systematically survey the full range of Scotus' thought. They take care to explain the technical details of his writing in lucid terms and demonstrate the relevance of his work to contemporary philosophical debate. New readers will find this the most convenient and accessible guide to Scotus currently available
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Alexander Broadie (2005). Review of Thomas Williams: The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus. [REVIEW] Journal of Scottish Philosophy 3 (1):95-98.
Stephen D. Dumont (2003). Review of Thomas Williams (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2003 (7).
Martin Tweedale (2004). Review of Jeffrey Brower, Kevin Guilfoy (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Abelard. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2004 (10).
Calvin G. Normore (2003). Duns Scotus' Modal Theory. In Thomas Williams (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus. Cambridge Up. 129-160.
Pascal Massie (2004). The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus. Review of Metaphysics 57 (3):655-656.
Jeffrey S. Purinton (2010). Review of James Warren (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (9).
Jeffrey E. Brower (2001). Duns Scotus (Review). Philosophia Christi 3:310-311.
Justin Bell (2011). The Cambridge Companion to Dewey (Review). Education and Culture 27 (2):92-96.
C. F. Delaney (2005). Review of Cheryl Misak (Ed), The Cambridge Companion to Peirce. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (9).
J. L. Schellenberg (2007). Review of Michael Martin (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Atheism. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (6).
Angela Coventry (2007). Review: The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Philosophy Edited by Donald Rutherford. [REVIEW] The Notre Dame Philosophical Review.
Philip J. Bartok (2004). Review of Dale Jacquette (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Brentano. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2004 (10).
Taylor Carman (2002). Review of Robert J. Dostal (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2002 (10).
John Collins (2006). Review of James McGilvray (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (4).
Wilfried Hinsch (2003). Review of Samuel Freeman (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2003 (10).
Added to index2010-09-12
Total downloads3 ( #275,324 of 1,096,521 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?