The Democratic Control of the Scientific Control of Democracy
Graduate studies at Western
In Dennis Dieks & Vassilios Karakostas (eds.), Recent Progress in Philosophy of Science: Perspectives and Foundational Problems. Springer (forthcoming)
|Abstract||I will discuss for two popular but apparently contradictory theses: T1. The democratic control of science – the aims and activities of science should be subject to public scrutiny via democratic processes of representation and participation. T2. The scientific control of policy, i.e. technocracy – political pro- cesses should be problem-solving pursuits determined by the methods and results of science and technology. Many arguments can be given for (T1), both epistemic and moral/political; I will focus on an argument based on the role of non-epistemic values in policy-relevant science. I will argue that we must accept (T2) as a result of an appraisal of the nature of contemporary political problems. Technocratic systems, however, are subject to serious moral and political objections; these difficulties are sufficiently mitigated by (T1). I will set out a framework in which (T1) and (T2) can be consistently and compellingly combined.|
|Keywords||science policy science-based policy technocracy science and democracy values in science expertise|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Helen E. Longino (2002). Science and the Common Good: Thoughts on Philip Kitcher's Science, Truth, and Democracy. Philosophy of Science 69 (4):560-568.
Philip Pettit (2012). On the People's Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. Cambridge University Press.
Heather Douglas (2005). Boundaries Between Science and Policy. Environmental Philosophy 2 (1):14-29.
Karl Rogers (2008). Participatory Democracy, Science and Technology: An Exploration in the Philosophy of Science. Palgrave Macmillan.
C. Shambu Prasad, Knowledge, Democracy and Science Policy: The Missing Dialogue in Globalised India.
I. C. Jarvie (2001). Science in a Democratic Republic. Philosophy of Science 68 (4):545-564.
Matthew J. Brown (forthcoming). Science and Democracy in International Relations. In Shane Ralston (ed.), Philosophical Pragmatism and International Relations: Essays for a Bold New World. Lexington.
Anwar Tlili & Emily Dawson (2010). Mediating Science and Society in the EU and UK: From Information-Transmission to Deliberative Democracy? Minerva 48 (4):429-461.
Joseph Agassi (1982). How Technology Aids and Impedes the Growth of Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:585 - 597.
Salvatore Vasta (2010). A New “Essential Tension” for Rationality and Culture. What Happens If Politics Tries to Encounter Science Again. Axiomathes 20 (1):129-143.
Arash Abizadeh (2008). Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders. Political Theory 36 (1):37-65.
René von Schomberg (ed.) (1993). Science, Politics, and Morality: Scientific Uncertainty and Decision Making. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Torsten Wilholt (2006). Scientific Autonomy and Planned Research: The Case of Space Science. Poiesis and Praxis 4 (4):253-265.
Erik Fisher (2011). Editorial Overview. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):607-620.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-07-04
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?