Faith and Philosophy 21 (3):295-303 (2004)
|Abstract||In a recent article, Edward Wierenga defends a version of Social Trinitarianism according to which the Persons of the Trinity form a unique society of really distinct divine beings, each of whom has its own exemplification of divinity. In this paper, I call attention to several philosophical and theological difficulties with Wierenga’s account, as well as to a problem that such difficulties pose for Social Trinitarianism generally. I then briefly suggest what I take to be a more promising approach to the Trinity.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Edward Wierenga (2004). Trinity and Polytheism. Faith and Philosophy 21 (3):281-294.
Kelly James Clark (1996). Trinity or Tritheism? Religious Studies 32 (4):463 - 476.
E. Feser (1997). Has Trinitarianism Been Shown to Be Coherent? Faith and Philosophy 14 (1):87-97.
Shirley Isaac (2010). A Critical Re-Evaluation of “Persons in Relation” and Its Significance for a Social Trinitarianism. Philosophy and Theology 22 (1/2):313-334.
William Hasker (2009). A Leftovian Trinity? Faith and Philosophy 26 (2):154-166.
Dale Tuggy (2003). The Unfinished Business of Trinitarian Theorizing. Religious Studies 39 (2):165-183.
James Anderson (2005). In Defence of Mystery: A Reply to Dale Tuggy. Religious Studies 41 (2):145-163.
H. E. Baber (2008). Trinity, Filioque and Semantic Ascent. Sophia 47 (2):149 - 160.
Peter Forrest (1998). Divine Fission: A New Way of Moderating Social Trinitarianism. Religious Studies 34 (3):281-297.
Dale Tuggy (2004). Divine Deception, Identity, and Social Trinitarianism. Religious Studies 40 (3):269-287.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #81,741 of 722,860 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,860 )
How can I increase my downloads?