Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||Applications of learning to autonomous agents (simulated or real) have often been restricted to learning a mapping from perceived state of the world to the next action to take. Often this is couched in terms of learning from no previous knowledge. This general case for real autonomous robots is very difficult. In any case, when building a real robot there is usually a lot of a priori knowledge (e.g., from the engineering that went into its design) which doesn’t need to be learned. We describe the behavior-based approach to autonomous robots, and then examine four classes of learning problems associated with such robots.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Shaun Gallagher (2006). Where's the Action? Epiphenomenalism and the Problem of Free Will. In Susan Pockett, William P. Banks & Shaun Gallagher (eds.), Does Consciousness Cause Behavior? MIT Press.
Patrizia Marti (2010). Robot Companions: Towards a New Concept of Friendship? Interaction Studies 11 (2):220-226.
Ron Sun, Beyond Simple Rule Extraction: The Extraction of Planning Knowledge From Reinforcement Learners.
C. T. A. Schmidt & F. Kraemer (2006). Robots, Dennett and the Autonomous: A Terminological Investigation. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 16 (1):73-80.
Ludovic Marin & Olivier Oullier (2001). When Robots Fail: The Complex Processes of Learning and Development. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1067-1068.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #95,562 of 728,298 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 728,298 )
How can I increase my downloads?