The Science and Politics of Global Climate Change: A Feminist Pragmatist Perspective
|Abstract||We offer a critical analysis of the science and politics of global climate change from a feminist pragmatist perspective, with special attention to the interactions between science and policy. We find the current state of play in all three areas (science, policy, and the space of interaction between them) to be lacking. We attribute mutual responsibility for the current impasse in addressing the climate crisis. What is called for is an alternative framework for thinking about science and policy interactions, which we sketch in general and in application to the increasingly serious problem of global climate change.|
|Keywords||Climate Change Science Policy Feminist Pragmatism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Sarina Keller (2010). Scientization: Putting Global Climate Change on the Scientific Agenda and the Role of the IPCC. [REVIEW] Poiesis and Praxis 7 (3):197-209.
Dan C. Shahar (2009). Justice and Climate Change: Toward a Libertarian Analysis. The Independent Review 14 (2):219-237.
Duane Windsor (2009). Global Justice and Global Climate Change. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 20:23-34.
Dale Jamieson (2010). Climate Change, Responsibility, and Justice. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (3):431-445.
Holly L. Wilson (2010). Divine Sovereignty and The Global Climate Change Debate. Essays in Philosophy 12 (1):8-15.
Jan Inglis (2008). Evolving to Address Global Climate Change and the Scale of Public Interactions. World Futures 64 (5 - 7):498 – 502.
Matthew J. Brown (forthcoming). Science and Democracy in International Relations. In Shane Ralston (ed.), Philosophical Pragmatism and International Relations: Essays for a Bold New World. Lexington.
Stephen M. Gardiner, Simon Caney, Dale Jamieson & Henry Shue (2010). Climate Ethics: Essential Readings. OUP USA.
Cary Coglianese & Jocelyn D'Ambrosio, Policymaking Under Pressure: The Perils of Incremental Responses to Climate Change.
Gregor Betz (2009). What Range of Future Scenarios Should Climate Policy Be Based On? Modal Falsificationism and its Limitations. Philosophia Naturalis 46 (1):133-158.
Melany Banks (2013). Individual Responsibility for Climate Change. Southern Journal of Philosophy 51 (1):42-66.
Francesca Pongiglione (2012). Anthropology and Climate Change: From Encounters to Actions; Political Theory and Global Climate Change. Ethics, Policy and Environment 15 (1):125 - 129.
Chen Xia & Martin Schönfeld (2011). A Daoist Response to Climate Change. Journal of Global Ethics 7 (2):195 - 203.
Gregor Betz (2009). Underdetermination, Model-Ensembles and Surprises: On the Epistemology of Scenario-Analysis in Climatology. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science 40 (1):3 - 21.
Martin Schönfeld (2011). Plan B: Global Ethics on Climate Change. Journal of Global Ethics 7 (2):129 - 136.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-07-04
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?