Philosophers' Imprint 12 (11) (2012)
|Abstract||Discourse containing the verb ‘feel’, almost without exception, purports to describe inner experience. Though this much is evident, the question remains what exactly is conveyed when we talk about what and how we feel? Does discourse containing the word ‘feel’ actually succeed in describing the content and phenomenology of inner experience? If so, how does it reflect the phenomenology and content of the experience it describes? Here I offer a linguistic analysis of ‘feels’ reports and argue that a subset of ‘feels’ reports, when accurate, reflect the representational content of emotions, tactile experiences and bodily sensations. Because ‘feels’ reports may reflect the representational content of bodily experience, these types of report may be able to give us some insight into the structure of bodily experience. I argue that our descriptions of bodily experience, on the assumption that they are sometimes accurate, indicate that emotions and tactile experiences are experiences of bodily reactions to objects, whereas bodily sensations are partial descriptions of emotions and tactile experiences or other events of the body. At the end I address the concern that an adequate account of inner experience cannot be given in terms of an analysis of ordinary language|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Timothy Schroeder (2007). Unexpected Pleasure. In Luc Faucher & Christine Tappolet (eds.), The Modularity of Emotions. University of Calgary Press.
Janet McCracken (2005). Falsely, Sanely, Shallowly. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (1):139-156.
Philip J. Nickel (2009). Trust, Staking, and Expectations. Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour 39 (3):345–362.
Aaron Smuts (2008). The Desire-Frustration Theory of Suspense. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (3):281-291.
Ian Hacking (1980). Strange Expectations. Philosophy of Science 47 (4):562-567.
Brendan Larvor (2009). Three is a Magic Number. The Philosopher's Magazine (44):83-88.
Richard McDermott (1979). Reasons, Rules and the Ring of Experience: Reading Our World Into Carlos Castaneda's Works. [REVIEW] Human Studies 2 (1):31 - 46.
Sascha Topolinski & Fritz Strack (2009). Scanning the “Fringe” of Consciousness: What is Felt and What is Not Felt in Intuitions About Semantic Coherence. Consciousness and Cognition 18 (3):608-618.
Timothy Schroeder (2008). Unexpected Pleasure. In Luc Faucher & Christine Tappolet (eds.), The Modularity of Emotions. University of Calgary Press.
Added to index2010-02-09
Total downloads30 ( #46,355 of 722,813 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,813 )
How can I increase my downloads?