David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84:57-64 (2010)
William of Ockham discussed the fallacy of amphiboly twice in his writings. The first treatment was in his Expositio super libros Elenchorum, where he simply presents Aristotle’s treatment, updates it with some Latin examples, and tells us it is not too important, since we do not often run into cases of ambiguity of thiskind. Later, in his Summa logicae, however, he extends his treatment appreciably. He here includes under ambiguous statements philosophical and theological sentences which are improperly stated. Led by Aristotle, Augustine and Anselm, Ockham finds that in their writings they give us instances of improper statements which need to be restated properly before they can be evaluated as true or false. These leads provide for Ockham a key to unlocking the teaching treasures of the Ancients
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
William Ockham (1983). Predestination, Foreknowledge, and Future Contingents. Indianapolis: Hackett.
William J. Courtenay (2008). Ockham and Ockhamism: Studies in the Dissemination and Impact of His Thought. Brill.
Arthur Stephen McGrade (1974). The Political Thought of William of Ockham. New York]Cambridge University Press.
Susan Brower-Toland (2014). How Chatton Changed Ockham's Mind: William Ockham and Walter Chatton on Objects and Acts of Judgment. In G. Klima (ed.), Intentionality, Cognition and Mental Representation in Medieval Philosophy. Fordham University Press
Alfred J. Freddoso (1991). Ontological Reductionism and Faith Versus Reason: A Critique of Adams on Ockham. Faith and Philosophy 8 (3):317-339.
Stephen Chak Tornay (1938). Ockham: Studies and Selections. La Salle, Ill.,The Open Court Publishing Company.
Roberto Lambertini (2006). Francis of Marchia and William of Ockham: Fragments From a Dialogue. Vivarium 44 (1):184-204.
J. D. Bastable (1956). William Ockham, Summa Logicae. Philosophical Studies 6:243-244.
Colin Connors (2009). Scotus and Ockham. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:141-153.
Paul Vincent Spade (1990). Ockham, Adams and Connotation: A Critical Notice of Marilyn Adams, William Ockham. Philosophical Review 99 (4):593-612.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads9 ( #231,597 of 1,700,409 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #128,702 of 1,700,409 )
How can I increase my downloads?