A social contract for biotechnology: Shared visions for risky technologies?

Future technological developmentsconcerning food, agriculture, and theenvironment face a gulf of social legitimationfrom a skeptical public and media, in the wakeof the crises of BSE, GM food, and foot andmouth disease in the UK (House of Lords, 2000). Keyethical issues were ignored by the bioindustry,regulators, and the Government, leaving alegacy of distrust. The paper examinesagricultural biotechnology in terms of a socialcontract, whose conditions would have to be fulfilled togain acceptance of novel applications. Variouscurrent and future GM applications areevaluated against these conditions. Successwould depend critically on how far a sharedvision can be found with the public. Tore-establish trust, significant changes areidentified in the planning and pursuit ofbiotechnology.
Keywords accountability  biotechnology  consultation  consumer perceptions  control  environmental risk  ethics  genetic modification  GM animals  GM food  GM crops  nutraceuticals  policy  power  risk  safety  shared vision  social contract  trust  values
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1015738727342
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,865
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
A. Wendy Russell & Robert Sparrow (2008). The Case for Regulating Intragenic Gmos. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (2):153-181.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Tony Smith (1999). Biotechnology and Global Justice. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 11 (3):219-242.
Jeffrey Burkhardt (2001). Agricultural Biotechnology and the Future Benefits Argument. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2):135-145.
Martha L. Crouch (1995). Biotechnology is Not Compatible with Sustainable Agriculture. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2):98-111.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

15 ( #171,637 of 1,724,890 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #210,935 of 1,724,890 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.