Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (6):595-604 (2003)
|Abstract||This paper examines the ethical andsocial questions that underlie the present UKdiscussion whether GM crops and organicagriculture can co-exist within a given regionor are mutually exclusive. A EuropeanCommission report predicted practicaldifficulties in achieving sufficientseparation distances to guarantee lowerthreshold levels proposed for GM material inorganic produce. Evidence of gene flow betweensome crops and their wild relatives has beena key issue in the recent Government consultation toconsult on whether or not to authorizecommercial planting of GM crops, following theresults of the current UK farm scale trials.The admixture of imported Bt transgenes intolandrace varieties of Mexican maize alsopresents difficulties. An ethical evaluationis made of the claim that organic growersshould expect protection from adventitioustraces of GM constructs in their products. Towhat extent – on either side of the debate –can any particular group in society set upagricultural standards for itself that mayeffectively restrain others from an otherwisejust business? The assumptions behind notionslike ``purity'' and ``contamination'' areexamined, together with their underlying viewsof nature and human intervention. The 2001UK Agriculture and Environmental BiotechnologyCommission report is relevant to theseissues. While the Government wishes to promotethe UK biotechnology industry and is underpressure from US claims of trade restraint, astrong organic lobby demands purity from GMcontamination. Does this adversarial framingof the issues reflect broader public opinionin the UK public consultation? Inarriving at policy decisions, the role of thevirtue of tolerance is considered inpost-modern and Christian ethical contexts.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Emma R. M. Cohen, Jennifer M. O'neill, Michel Joffres, Ross E. G. Upshur & Edward Mills (2009). Reporting of Informed Consent, Standard of Care and Post-Trial Obligations in Global Randomized Intervention Trials: A Systematic Survey of Registered Trials. Developing World Bioethics 9 (2):74-80.
M. J. Goss & D. A. J. Barry (1995). Groundwater Quality: Responsible Agriculture and Public Perceptions. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (1).
Michael J. Reiss (2001). Ethical Considerations at the Various Stages in the Development, Production, and Consumption of GM Crops. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2):179-190.
Edith T. Lammerts Van Bueren & Paul C. Struik (2005). Integrity and Rights of Plants: Ethical Notions in Organic Plant Breeding and Propagation. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (5).
John A. Howard & Kirby C. Donnelly (2004). A Quantitative Safety Assessment Model for Transgenic Protein Products Produced in Agricultural Crops. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (6).
Michael M. Burgess (2004). Public Consultation in Ethics an Experiment in Representative Ethics. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 1 (1).
Sarika Cardoso & Harvey James Jr (2012). Ethical Frameworks and Farmer Participation in Controversial Farming Practices. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (3):377-404.
N. Halberg, E. Steen Kristensen & I. Sillebak Kristensen (1995). Nitrogen Turnover on Organic and Conventional Mixed Farms. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (1).
Celina Ramjoué (2007). The Transatlantic Rift in Genetically Modified Food Policy. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (5).
James Wilson (2007). GM Crops: Patently Wrong? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (3).
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #232,382 of 549,066 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,066 )
How can I increase my downloads?