Executive functions in decision making: An individual differences approach
Thinking and Reasoning 16 (2):69-97 (2011)
| Abstract | This individual differences study examined the relationships between three executive functions (updating, shifting, and inhibition), measured as latent variables, and performance on two cognitively demanding subtests of the Adult Decision Making Competence battery: Applying Decision Rules and Consistency in Risk Perception. Structural equation modelling showed that executive functions contribute differentially to performance in these two tasks, with Applying Decision Rules being mainly related to inhibition and Consistency in Risk Perception mainly associated to shifting. The results suggest that the successful application of decision rules requires the capacity to selectively focus attention and inhibit irrelevant (or no more relevant) stimuli. They also suggest that consistency in risk perception depends on the ability to shift between judgement contexts | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Elke U. Weber & Jessica S. Ancker (2005). Towards a Taxonomy of Modes of Moral Decision-Making. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):563-564.
Wayne Martin & Ryan Hickerson (2013). Mental Capacity and the Applied Phenomenology of Judgement. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 12 (1):195-214.
Thomas Pink (1996). The Psychology of Freedom. Cambridge University Press.
Stephen B. Knouse & Robert A. Giacalone (1992). Ethical Decision-Making in Business: Behavioral Issues and Concerns. Journal of Business Ethics 11 (5-6):369 - 377.
Sharon Galbraith & Harriet Buckman Stephenson (1993). Decision Rules Used by Male and Female Business Students in Making Ethical Value Judgments: Another Look. Journal of Business Ethics 12 (3):227 - 233.
Elisa Gambetti & Fiorella Giusberti (2008). Dispositional Anger and Risk Decision-Making. Mind and Society 8 (1):7-20.
Colin J. Palmer, Bryan Paton, Trung T. Ngo, Richard H. Thomson, Jakob Hohwy & Steven M. Miller (2013). Individual Differences in Moral Behaviour: A Role for Response to Risk and Uncertainty? Neuroethics 6 (1):97-103.
E. Fioratou & K. J. Gilhooly (2011). Executive Functions in Insight Versus Non-Insight Problem Solving: An Individual Differences Approach. Thinking and Reasoning 15 (4):355-376.
E. Fioratou & K. J. Gilhooly (2011). Executive Functions in Insight Versus Non-Insight Problem Solving: An Individual Differences Approach. Thinking and Reasoning 15 (4):355-376.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-07-27Total downloads6 ( #145,729 of 549,198 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,198 )How can I increase my downloads? |

