Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Click here to configure this browser for off-campus access.
- Jacques Brunschwig (2006). Goldschmidt and Gueroult: Some Facts, Some Enigmas. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 88 (1):82-106.Martial Gueroult (1891–1976) and Victor Goldschmidt (1914–1981) are two major figures in French history of philosophy during the second half of the last century. The latter has often been described as one of the former's “disciples”, on the basis of their common opposition to the “geneticist” approach in the study of past philosophers, and their common support for a “structuralist” one, which was an influential paradigm in various fields of French thought at the time of their activity. A detailed study of their methodological principles and their concrete practice shows that their relationship was much more complicated.
Similar books and articles
The review focuses on Huxley’s debt to Richard Goldschmidt and Cyril Darlington. I discuss the conceptions of the genome developed by Goldschmidt and Darlington and their continuing relevance.
L'application de la notion de structure à l'analyse des systèmes philosophiques est sans doute l'un des développements les plus fructueux de ce qu'on a appelé le structuralisme. La tradition inaugurée par Martial Gueroult et poursuivie par Victor Goldschmidt, Jules Vuillemin et d'autres a conduit à une fondation critique de la notion de système philosophique et a renouvelé profondément la méthode de l'histoire de la philosophie. En cherchant à reconstituer les orientations principales de cette tradition, nous essayons d'abord de distinguer le structuralisme en philosophie du structuralisme en mathématique et en linguistique. Nous prenons comme base de discussion de cette question l'analyse de Gilles-Gaston Granger donnée en 1967, dans Pensée formelle et sciences de l'homme. Ensuite, nous abordons trois problèmes centraux de l'application de la notion de système en philosophie. La question de la clôture des concepts philosophiques ; la question de la vérité ; la question des rapports entre science et philosophie.
No categories
No categories
No categories
Big Brother, the tyrant of George Orwell's 1984, directed his daily Two Minutes Hate against Emmanuel Goldstein, enemy of the people. When I studied evolutionary biology in graduate school during the mid-1960s, official rebuke and derision focused upon Richard Goldschmidt, a famous geneticist who, we were told, had gone astray. Although 1984 creeps up on us, I trust that the world will not be in Big Brother's grip by then. I do, however, predict that during this decade Goldschmidt will be largely vindicated in the world of evolutionary biology.
ig Brother, the tyrant of George Orwell's 1984, directed his daily Two Minutes Hate against Emmanuel Goldstein, enemy of the people. When I studied evolutionary biology in graduate school during the mid 1960s, official rebuke and derision focused upon Richard Goldschmidt , a famous geneticist who, we were told, had gone astray. Although 1984 creeps up on us, I trust that the world will not be in Big Brother's grip by then. I do, however, predict that during this decade Goldschmidt will be largely vindicated in the world of evolutionary biology.
Martial Gueroult est parmi les historiens français de la philosophie : ses travaux permettent d'étudier la divergence des dimensions de activité d'interprétation (commentaire, méthodologie, fondation). Cet article procède à une lecture de ses monographies emblématiques, essaie de comprendre la limitation du champ de leurs objets, se risque à une critique de Vidéalisme radical pour finalement expliquer que le manuscrit de la Dianoématique n'ait jamais été publié, sans pourtant que son auteur en désavoue l'intention : son principal défaut relevait d'une contradiction théorique. Martial Gueroult is an exemplary case among the historians of philosophy : his works enable to study the discrepancy between the various interpretative activities (commentary, methodology, foundation). The aim of this article is to read his symbolic monographies, to understand the limitation of their perspective, to criticize radical idealism and hstly to explain that the manuscript of the Dianoematic has never been issued, without its author ever denying his intention to do so. Its main defect was a theoretical contradiction.
No categories
No categories
Richard Goldschmidt famously rejected the notion of atomic and corpuscular genes, arranged on the chromosome like beads-on-a-string. I provide an exegesis of Goldschmidt’s intuition by analyzing his repeated and extensive use of metaphorical language and analogies in his attempts to convey his notion of the nature of the genetic material and specifically the significance of chromosomal pattern. The paper concentrates on Goldschmidt’s use of metaphors in publications spanning 1940-1955.
Discussion of Jacques Brunschwig, Goldschmidt and Gueroult: Some facts, some enigmas
|
|
There are no threads in this forum |
Nothing in this forum yet.

