Hinge propositions and epistemic justification
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (3):285–287 (2007)
| Abstract | Michael Williams and Crispin Wright have claimed that we are epistemically justified in believing hinge propositions, such as there is an external world. In a recent paper Allan Hazlett puts forward an argument that purports to elucidate the source of such justification. This paper reconstructs Hazlett's argument and offers a criticism of it. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesColin Ruloff (2009). Epistemic Supervenience and Internalism: A Trilemma. Theoria 75 (2):129-151.
Jane Duran (1988). Causal Reference and Epistemic Justification. Philosophy of Science 55 (2):272-279.
Colin Cheyne (2009). A Paradox of Justified Believing. Ratio 22 (3):278-290.
Nenad Miščević (2005). Is Apriority Context-Sensitive? Acta Analytica 20 (1):55-80.
Ram Neta (2007). Propositional Justification, Evidence, and the Cost of Error. Philosophical Issues 17 (1):197–216.
Robert Audi (1991). Structural Justification. Journal of Philosophical Research 16:473-492.
Andrew W. Howat (2013). Regulative Assumptions, Hinge Propositions and the Peircean Conception of Truth. Erkenntnis 78 (2):451-468.
Allan Hazlett (2006). How to Defeat Belief in the External World. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (2):198–212.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads47 ( #23,170 of 549,754 )Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,337 of 549,754 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
