Graduate studies at Western
History of Philosophy Quarterly 27 (2):165-80 (2010)
|Abstract||Philosophical discussions of Molyneux's problem within contemporary philosophy of mind tend to characterize the problem as primarily concerned with the role innately known principles, amodal spatial concepts, and rational cognitive faculties play in our perceptual lives. Indeed, for broadly similar reasons, rationalists have generally advocated an affirmative answer, while empiricists have generally advocated a negative one, to the question Molyneux posed after presenting his famous thought experiment. This historical characterization of the dialectic, however, somewhat obscures the role Molyneux's problem has played in spawning debates within the empiricist tradition. Fortunately, the differences between various empiricist accounts have been widely recognized and discussed among historians of philosophy working on the topic. The focus of the present essay is to develop an interpretation of John Locke's views on Molyneux's problem that best coheres with his other views on human understanding as well as with the predominant scientific opinion about the nature of perception during the period in which he lived.|
|Keywords||Molyneux Problem Locke Multimodal Perception|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Martha B. Bolton (1994). The Real Molyneux Question and the Basis of Locke's Answer. In G. A. J. Rogers (ed.), Locke's Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ralph Schumacher (2003). What Are the Direct Objects of Sight? Locke on the Molyneux Question. Locke Studies 3:41-62.
Laura Berchielli (2002). Color, Space, and Figure in Locke: An Interpretation of the Molyneux Problem. Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (1):47-65.
Judith Jarvis Thomson (1974). Molyneux's Problem. Journal of Philosophy 71 (October):637-650.
Alessandra C. Jacomuzzi, Pietro Kobau & Nicola Bruno (2003). Molyneux's Question Redux. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 2 (4):255-280.
V. C. Chappell (1994). Locke on the Intellectual Basis of Sin. Journal of the History of Philosophy 32 (2):197-207.
Vere Chappell (1994). Locke on the Intellectual Basis of Sin. Journal of the History of Philosophy 32 (2):197-207.
Brian Glenney (2012). Leibniz on Molyneux's Question. History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (3):247-264.
Robert Hopkins (2005). Molyneux's Question. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (3):441-464.
Brian R. Glenney (2013). Philosophical Problems, Cluster Concepts, and the Many Lives of Molyneux's Question. Biology and Philosophy 28 (3):541-558.
John Schwenkler (2013). Do Things Look the Way They Feel? Analysis 73 (1):86-96.
Richard Gray (2000). Locke and the Story of the Studious Blind Man. The Locke Newsletter 31:69-77.
Robert Hopkins (2005). Thomas Reid on Molyneux's Question. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (3):340-364.
Added to index2012-11-06
Total downloads8 ( #131,909 of 739,100 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,464 of 739,100 )
How can I increase my downloads?