Locke's Answer to Molyneux's Thought Experiment

History of Philosophy Quarterly 27 (2):165-80 (2010)
Abstract
Philosophical discussions of Molyneux's problem within contemporary philosophy of mind tend to characterize the problem as primarily concerned with the role innately known principles, amodal spatial concepts, and rational cognitive faculties play in our perceptual lives. Indeed, for broadly similar reasons, rationalists have generally advocated an affirmative answer, while empiricists have generally advocated a negative one, to the question Molyneux posed after presenting his famous thought experiment. This historical characterization of the dialectic, however, somewhat obscures the role Molyneux's problem has played in spawning debates within the empiricist tradition. Fortunately, the differences between various empiricist accounts have been widely recognized and discussed among historians of philosophy working on the topic. The focus of the present essay is to develop an interpretation of John Locke's views on Molyneux's problem that best coheres with his other views on human understanding as well as with the predominant scientific opinion about the nature of perception during the period in which he lived.
Keywords Molyneux Problem  Locke  Multimodal Perception
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,357
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA
    Similar books and articles
    Brian Glenney, Molyneux's Question. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Judith Jarvis Thomson (1974). Molyneux's Problem. Journal of Philosophy 71 (October):637-650.
    V. C. Chappell (1994). Locke on the Intellectual Basis of Sin. Journal of the History of Philosophy 32 (2):197-207.
    Vere Chappell (1994). Locke on the Intellectual Basis of Sin. Journal of the History of Philosophy 32 (2):197-207.
    Brian Glenney (2012). Leibniz on Molyneux's Question. History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (3):247-264.
    Robert Hopkins (2005). Molyneux's Question. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (3):441-464.
    Robert Hopkins (2005). Thomas Reid on Molyneux's Question. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (3):340-364.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2012-11-06

    Total downloads

    11 ( #112,987 of 1,088,810 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    6 ( #17,284 of 1,088,810 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.