“Other selves”: Moral and legal proposals regarding the personhood of cryopreserved human embryos

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (2):105-129 (2009)
Abstract
This essay has two purposes. The first is to argue that our moral duties towards human embryos should be assessed in light of the Golden Rule by asking the normative question, “how would I want to be treated if I were an embryo?” Some reject the proposition “I was an embryo” on the basis that embryos should not be recognized as persons. This essay replies to five common arguments denying the personhood of human embryos: (1) that early human embryos lack ontological individuation; (2) that they are members of the species Homo sapiens but not yet human persons; (3) that the argument for personhood commits the “heap argument” fallacy; (4) that since human procreation in nature is inefficient, human embryos cannot be persons; and (5) the “burning building” scenario proves that all arguments for personhood are irrational or inconsistent. The second purpose is to set forth and criticize in light of the normative judgement defended in part one the present legal situation of cryo-preserved embryos in the U.S. The essay ends by proposing legislative reforms to protect ex utero human embryos.
Keywords Human embryo  Personhood  Embryo experimentation  Cryo-preserved embryos  Frozen embryos  Human rights  In vitro fertilization  Assisted reproductive technology
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,371
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
E. Christian Brugger (2005). In Defense of Transferring Heterologous Embryos. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 5 (1):95-112.
Maureen L. Condic & Samuel B. Condic (2005). Defining Organisms by Organization. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 5 (2):331-353.

View all 15 references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-03-04

Total downloads

22 ( #79,412 of 1,102,846 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #296,987 of 1,102,846 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.