David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Semiotics. Legas 37-46 (2009)
The notion that we live, or should live, in a “post-metaphysical” age is prevalent, with semiotics displacing metaphysics in many quarters; in other words, the study of meaning has supplanted the study of being. Charles Peirce, a founder of contemporary semiotics, seems to agree with this view on occasion; claiming, for example, “The demonstrations of the metaphysicians are all moonshine.” (Peirce c.1897: 1.7) On the other hand, Peirce consistently reserved a place for metaphysics within his classification of the sciences, serving in part as a bridge between philosophy and the special sciences. Thus, while Peirce consistently argues that metaphysics must rest upon logic/semiotic – citing the exemplars of Aristotle and Kant – a properly Peircean metaphysics is irreducible to, and irreplaceable by, semiotics (cp. Peirce c.1902: 2.121). This paper will explore Peirce’s understanding of metaphysics in relation to his semiotics, focusing on the following issues. First, I will analyze some of Peirce’s claims concerning the relationship between semiotics and metaphysics within his classification(s) of the sciences. Second, I will address Peirce’s claim that metaphysics is unavoidable, for “[f]ind a scientific man who proposes to get along without any metaphysics…and you have found one whose doctrines are thoroughly vitiated by the crude and uncriticized metaphysics with which they are packed.” (Peirce 1905-1906: 1.129) Third, I will explore briefly the relationship between metaphysics and the special sciences. Answering these questions, and stimulating new ones, should help us begin to understand why such a thoroughly semiotic thinker as Peirce maintains the need for metaphysics.
|Keywords||Charles Peirce semiotics metaphysics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Terrance King (1981). Culture and Mind in Peircean Semiotics. Semiotics:359-367.
Karen A. Haworth (2008). Perceiving Peirce: Or Why I Believe Becoming a Peircean is Necessary. Semiotics:661-667.
Joseph Dellinger (2008). A Brief Peircean Pragmatic Look Into Geertz's Cockfight. Semiotics:172-178.
Ivo A. Ibri (2010). Peircean Seeds for a Philosophy of Art. Semiotics:1-16.
Eliseo Fernández (2010). Peircean Habits and the Life of Symbols. Semiotics:98-109.
Vincent Colapietro (1996). Peircean Reflections on Gendered Subjects. Semiotics:179-188.
Ralph Austin Powell (1992). Voters' Peircean Free Non-Existence. Semiotics:223-228.
Terry J. Prewitt (2009). The Peircean Sign-Field and Dynamics of Semiosis. Semiotics:338-353.
John K. Sheriff (1991). The Experience of a Literary Text From a Peircean Perspective. Semiotics:375-381.
Rossella Fabbrichesi & Susanna Marietti (eds.) (2006). Semiotics and Philosophy in Charles Saunders Peirce. Cambridge Scholars Press.
Ronald F. White (1982). Peircean Perspectives on Experimental Psychology and the Unconscious Mind. Semiotics:515-527.
Winfried Nöth (1999). Peircean Semiotics in the Study of Iconicity in Language. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 35 (3):613 - 619.
Klaus Oehler (1987). Is a Transcendental Foundation of Semiotics Possible? A Peircean Consideration. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 23 (1):45 - 63.
Kelley J. Wells (1994). Contra Margolis' Peircean Constructivism: A Peircean Pragmatic "Logos". Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 30 (4):839 - 860.
Added to index2012-09-18
Total downloads7 ( #292,059 of 1,725,578 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #167,283 of 1,725,578 )
How can I increase my downloads?