China Review International 10 (1):157-164 (2003)
|Abstract||This is a full length review in which I discuss the strengths and weaknesses of Jane Geaney's On the Epistemology of the Senses in Early Chinese Thought. Geaney's strengths lie in her refusal to import Western epistemological presuppositions into depictions of Early Chinese philosophy, her meticulous canvassing of key Warring States texts, and her insightful reconstruction of Early Chinese epistemology as based on perception rather than abstract concepts. Her weaknesses are the limited range of her representative texts and her occasional overgeneralizations. In the first half of the review, I summarize Geaney's solid conclusions: knowledge in Warring States texts was stated in terms of, and even constituted by, seeing and hearing (as opposed to the primacy of sight in the West); seeing and hearing were referred to in paired tropes; the epistemology of seeing and hearing generally involved moral evaluation; and the heartmind had a triple role in this process as verifier, as ruler, and as a sense in its own right. In the second half of the review, I demonstrate the limitations of Geaney's methodology, using her example of the relationship of qi and wind.|
|Keywords||Chinese philosophy Early China Ancient China Epistemology Knowledge Senses Perception Qi Wind Heartmind|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jane Geaney (2010). Grounding "Language" in the Senses: What the Eyes and Ears Reveal About Ming 名 (Names) in Early Chinese Texts. Philosophy East and West 60 (2):pp. 251-293.
Jane Geaney (2000). Review: Chinese Cosmology and Recent Studies in Confucian Ethics: A Review Essay. [REVIEW] Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (3):449 - 470.
Xinyan Jiang (2005). On the Epistemology of the Senses in Early Chinese Thought (Review). Philosophy East and West 55 (3):489-493.
Karyn Lai (2008). An Introduction to Chinese Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Xiong Liwen (2008). Dialogues Between Western and Eastern Culture From the Aspect of Logic. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 36:83-90.
Reg Little, When Civilizations Compete: A Review of Steven Shankman & Stephen W. Durrant (Eds), Early China / Ancient Greece: Thinking Through Comparisons. [REVIEW]
Edward Slingerland (2011). Metaphor and Meaning in Early China. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10 (1):1-30.
Quanxing Xu (2008). Theory on the Cultivation of Cognitive Subjects in Chinese Philosophy. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (1):39-54.
Ningzhong Shi (2010). Proposition, Definition and Inference in Ancient Chinese Philosophy. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (3):414-431.
Chris Fraser (2011). Knowledge and Error in Early Chinese Thought. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10 (2):127-148.
Aihe Wang (2000). Cosmology and Political Culture in Early China. Cambridge University Press.
Xu Quanxing & Huang Deyuan (2008). Theory on the Cultivation of Cognitive Subjects in Chinese Philosophy. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (1):39 - 54.
Kwong-loi Shun (1997). Mencius and Early Chinese Thought. Stanford University Press.
Added to index2010-09-21
Total downloads6 ( #145,546 of 549,067 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,067 )
How can I increase my downloads?