Graduate studies at Western
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (3):310-314 (2009)
|Abstract||We consider one of Eric Olson's chief arguments for animalism about personal identity: the view that we are each identical to a human animal. The argument was originally given in Olson's book The Human Animal . Olson's argument presupposes an epistemological premise which we examine in detail. We argue that the premise is implausible and that Olson's defense of animalism is therefore in trouble.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ned Markosian (2008). Three Problems for Olson's Account of Personal Identity. Abstracta 3 (3):16-22.
Dean Zimmerman (2008). Problems for Animalism. Abstracta 3 (3):23-31.
Eric Olson (2009). An Argument for Animalism. In John P. Lizza (ed.), Defining the Beginning and End of Life: Readings on Personal Identity and Bioethics. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Stephan Blatti (2006). Animalism. In A. C. Grayling, A. Pyle & N. Goulder (eds.), Continuum Encyclopedia of British Philosophy. Thoemmes Continuum.
Eric T. Olson (1997). The Human Animal: Personal Identity Without Psychology. Oxford University Press.
Eric T. Olson (1995). Human People or Human Animals? Philosophical Studies 80 (2):159-181.
Peter Nichols (2010). Substance Concepts and Personal Identity. Philosophical Studies 150 (2):255-270.
Eric T. Olson (2004). Animalism and the Corpse Problem. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (2):265-74.
Added to index2009-10-01
Total downloads93 ( #9,170 of 751,540 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,969 of 751,540 )
How can I increase my downloads?