Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (4):451-492 (2004)
|Abstract||So-called grand or paradigmatic theories—structural functionalism, psychoanalysis, Marxism, rational-choice theory—provide their proponents with a conceptual vocabulary and syntax that allows for the classification and configuring of wide ranges of phenomena. Advocates for any particular “analytical grammar” are accordingly prone to conflating the internal coherence of their paradigm—its integrated complex of definitions, axioms, and inferences—with a corresponding capacity for representational verisimilitude. The distinction between Theory-as-heuristic and Theory-as-imposition is of course difficult to negotiate in practice, given that empirical observation and measurement are not entirely “theory neutral” or independent of prior analytical conceptualization. Nonetheless, the scientific cogency of any theory is ultimately evaluated by the substantive realism of its foundational assumptions and categorical designations; that is, the accuracy with which it identifies and tracks the determinant properties and processes of the phenomena to be explicated. The paradigm of sociocultural evolutionism—despite extensive revamping by contemporary proponents—does not carry warrant in this regard, as its recourse to an analytical grammar fashioned and derived from another discipline raises doubts about its empirical veridicality. This article revisits the contentious issue of remodeling social phenomena in accordance with biological categories and offers both a theoretical and a substantive critique of the “selectionist” paradigm. The transdisciplinary program of historical social science is affirmed by way of counterpoint|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
L. Jason Glynos (2000). Sexual Identity, Identification and Difference: A Psychoanalytic Contribution to Discourse Theory. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (6):85-108.
John A. Smith (2006). Qualitative Complexity: Ecology, Cognitive Processes and the Re-Emergence of Structures in Post-Humanist Social Theory. Routledge.
Ann E. Cudd (2005). How to Explain Oppression: Criteria of Adequacy for Normative Explanatory Theories. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (1):20-49.
Daniel Little (1986). Historical Materialism and Capital. Topoi 5 (2):187-196.
Peter C. Ordeshook (1995). Engineering or Science: What is the Study of Politics? Critical Review 9 (1-2):175-188.
Lucas McGranahan (2011). William James's Social Evolutionism in Focus. The Pluralist 6 (3):80-92.
Roberto Veneziani (2008). Review Essay: A Future for (Analytical) Marxism? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (3):388-399.
Richard Harvey Brown (1989). Social Science as Civic Discourse: Essays on the Invention, Legitimation, and Uses of Social Theory. University of Chicago Press.
Dean R. Gerstein (1983). Durkheim's Paradigm: Reconstructing a Social Theory. Sociological Theory 1:234-258.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #142,473 of 739,396 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?