Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):743-744 (1997)
|Abstract||Ballard et al. show how control structures using minimal state can be made flexible enough for complex cognitive tasks by using deictic pointers, but they do so within a specific computational framework. We discuss broader implications in cognition and memory and provide biological evidence for their theory. We also suggest an alternative account of pointer binding, which may better explain their limited number.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Fiona Spensley (1997). Beyond Representational Redescription. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (2):354-355.
Antonella Carassa & Maurizio Tirassa (1994). Representational Redescription and Cognitive Architectures. Carassa, Antonella and Tirassa, Maurizio (1994) Representational Redescription and Cognitive Architectures. [Journal (Paginated)].
Robert A. Wilson (1997). Pointers, Codes, and Embodiment. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):757-758.
Matthew Schlesinger (2001). Reexamining Visual Cognition in Human Infants: On the Necessity of Representation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):1003-1004.
Arne M. Weber & Gottfried Vosgerau (2012). Grounding Action Representations. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (1):53-69.
Julie Epelboim (1997). Deictic Codes, Embodiment of Cognition, and the Real World. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):746-746.
Jason L. Megill (2003). What Role Do the Emotions Play in Cognition? Towards a New Alternative to Cognitive Theories of Emotion. Consciousness and Emotion 4 (1):81-100.
L. J. (2003). What Role Do the Emotions Play in Cognition?: Towards a New Alternative to Cognitive Theories of Emotion. Consciousness and Emotion 4 (1):81-100.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?