Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):679-680 (2002)
|Abstract||Language isn't the only way to cross modules, nor is it the only module with access to both input and output. Minds don't generally work across modules because this leads to combinatorial explosion in search and planning. Language is special in being a good vector for mimetics, so it becomes associated with useful cross-module concepts we acquire culturally. Further, language is indexical, so it facilitates computationally expensive operations.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
E. J. Ashworth (1985). Studies in Post-Medieval Semantics. Variorum Reprints.
Petra Hendriks, Helen Hoop & Henriëtte Swart (2012). The Interplay Between the Speaker's and the Hearer's Perspective. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 21 (1):1-5.
Alison Gopnik & Andrew N. Meltzoff (1998). Theories Vs. Modules: To the Max and Beyond: A Reply to Poulin-Dubois and to Stich and Nichols. Mind and Language 13 (3):450-456.
Anna Strhan (2011). Religious Language as Poetry: Heidegger's Challenge. Heythrop Journal 52 (6):926-938.
Lynne Rudder Baker (1988). Cognitive Suicide. In Robert H. Grimm & D. D. Merrill (eds.), Contents of Thought. University of Arizona Press.
Jerry A. Fodor & Ernest LePore (1991). Why Meaning (Probably) Isn't Conceptual Role. Mind and Language 6 (4):328-43.
William J. Rapaport (1993). Because Mere Calculating Isn't Thinking: Comments on Hauser's Why Isn't My Pocket Calculator a Thinking Thing?. Minds and Machines 3 (1):11-20.
Scott Atran (2002). A Metamodule for Conceptual Integration: Language or Theory of Mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):674-675.
Derek Bickerton (2003). Afferent Isn't Efferent, and Language Isn't Logic, Either. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):286-287.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #232,265 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?