David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Economics and Philosophy 7 (01):83-86 (1991)
Since a paradigmatic approach is judged in part by the range of phenomena it can explain, neoclassical microeconomists have no doubt gained assurance about the power of their paradigm by the invasion of economics into a number of related fields, what Hirschleifer has referred to as the “expanding domain of economics.” Moreover, even beyond these excursions into the provinces of other social sciences concerned with human behavior, economics has also recently expanded into the analysis of animal behavior . This development not only adds more scientific prestige to the approach, but allows economists to use research techniques developed in more experimentally oriented disciplines
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Karianne Kalshoven & Franck L. B. Meijboom (2013). Sustainability at the Crossroads of Fish Consumption and Production Ethical Dilemmas of Fish Buyers at Retail Organizations in The Netherlands. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (1):101-117.
Paul R. Noble (1994). Hermeneutics and Post-Modernism: Can We Have a Radical Reader-Response Theory? Part I. Religious Studies 30 (4):419 - 436.
John McMurtry (2012). Behind Global System Collapse: The Life-Blind Structure of Economic Rationality. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 108 (1):49-60.
Jennifer Roback Morse (2005). Rationality Means Being Willing to Say You're Sorry. Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (2):204-225.
Steven E. Edwards (1987). In Defense of Environmental Economics. Environmental Ethics 9 (1):73-85.
Gajo Petrović (1963). Man as Economic Animal and Man as Praxis an Interpretation of Marx. Inquiry 6 (1-4):35 – 56.
Gajo Petrovi (1963). Man as Economic Animal and Man as Praxis an Interpretation of Marx. Inquiry 6 (1-4):35 – 56.
Ken Binmore (2005). Economic Man – or Straw Man? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):817-818.
Mark D. White (2003). Reconciling Homo Economicus and John Dewey's Ethics. Journal of Economic Methodology 10 (2):223-243.
Euclid Tsakalotos (2004). "Homo Economicus", Political Economy and Socialism. Science and Society 68 (2):137 - 160.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads8 ( #239,234 of 1,696,233 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #333,716 of 1,696,233 )
How can I increase my downloads?