Response-Dependence of Concepts Is Not for Properties

American Philosophical Quarterly 45 (4):377 - 386 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to show that response-dependence is not a metaphysically significant notion unless applied directly to properties. Therefore, a distinction between response-dependent concepts and response-dependent properties must be kept clear. While a notion of response-dependent concepts can in some cases be useful, it is quite different from a metaphysically notion of response-dependent properties. Some common accounts of response-dependence are described, and then it is shown how response-dependence can be applied to concepts without implications for properties. Two arguments for the claim that response-dependence for concepts implies response-dependence for properties are then considered and rejected.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Acceptance-dependence: A social kind of response-dependence.Frank A. Hindriks - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):481–498.
Response-Dependence.Christine Tappolet & Roberto Casati - 1998 - European Review of Philosophy 3:227.
Two conceptions of response-dependence.Rafael De Clercq - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 107 (2):159-177.
Supervenience, determination, and dependence.Jeffrey Yoshimi - 2007 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (1):114–133.
Pragmatism, Truth and Response-Dependence.Andrew Howat - 2005 - Facta Philosophica 7 (2):231-253.
Ontological dependence.Fabrice Correia - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (5):1013-1032.
How (not) to specify normal conditions for response-dependent concepts.Jussi Haukioja - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (2):325 – 331.
Aesthetic Qualities as Iterated Response-dependent.Božidar Kante - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 1:129-136.
Secondary and tertiary qualities: Semantics and response--dependence.Nenad Miscevic - 1997 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (4):363-379.
Interpreting Thomas Kuhn as a Response-Dependence Theorist.Nathaniel Goldberg - 2011 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (5):729 - 752.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-17

Downloads
49 (#317,389)

6 months
7 (#411,886)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eyja M. Brynjarsdóttir
University of Iceland

Citations of this work

How Do Technological Artefacts Embody Moral Values?Michael Klenk - 2020 - Philosophy and Technology 34 (3):525-544.
Shallow versus deep response-dependence.Andrew William Howat - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 156 (2):155-172.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references