David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Consciousness and Cognition 12 (2):219-230 (2003)
Two experiments investigated the reality attributed to hypnotic suggestion through subtle projection of a visual image during simultaneous suggestion for a visual hallucination that resembled the projected image. In Experiment 1, high and low hypnotizable participants were administered either a hypnotic induction or wake instructions, given a suggestion to hallucinate a shape, and then the projected image was subsequently introduced. Although highs in both conditions rated the projected image more vividly than lows, highs in the hypnosis condition made comparable reality ratings when the projected image was absent and present. In Experiment 2, high hypnotizable participants were administered a suggestion to see a shape on a wall. For half the participants the suggested image was projected on the wall and then removed, and for half the projection was initially absent and then introduced. Participants who had the projection absent and then present reported comparable reality and vividness ratings when the projection was absent and present. These findings indicate that elevated hypnotizability and hypnosis are associated with attributions of external reality to suggested experiences
|Keywords||*Hypnosis *Hypnotic Susceptibility *Imagery *Suggestibility *Visual Hallucinations Form and Shape Perception Reality Self Monitoring|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Johanna C. Badcock & Murray T. Maybery (2005). Common or Distinct Deficits for Auditory and Visual Hallucinations? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):757-758.
C. M. MacLeod & P. W. Sheehan (2003). Hypnotic Control of Attention in the Stroop Task: A Historical Footnote. Consciousness and Cognition 12 (3):347-353.
Ronald J. Pekala & V. K. Kumar (2000). Individual Differences in Patterns of Hypnotic Experience Across Low and High Hypnotically Susceptible Individuals. In Robert G. Kunzendorf & Benjamin Wallace (eds.), Individual Differences in Conscious Experience. John Benjamins. 309-335.
Imants Baruss (2003). Hypnosis. In , Alterations of Consciousness: An Empirical Analysis for Social Scientists. American Psychological Association. 107-133.
Ralf-Peter Behrendt (2005). Attentional Deficit Versus Impaired Reality Testing: What is the Role of Executive Dysfunction in Complex Visual Hallucinations? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):758-759.
Stephen Grossberg (2002). Neural Substrates of Visual Percepts, Imagery, and Hallucinations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):194-195.
Katalin Farkas (2014). A Sense of Reality. In Fiona MacPherson & Dimitris Platchias (eds.), Hallucinations. MIT Press. 399-417.
Frédérique Robin (2010). Imagery and Memory Illusions. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9 (2):253-262.
Kevin M. Spencer & Robert W. McCarley (2005). Visual Hallucinations, Attention, and Neural Circuitry: Perspectives From Schizophrenia Research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):774-774.
M. C. & W. P. (2003). Hypnotic Control of Attention in the Stroop Task: A Historical Footnote. Consciousness and Cognition 12 (3):347-353.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads33 ( #62,058 of 1,679,372 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #182,933 of 1,679,372 )
How can I increase my downloads?