Why robot nannies probably won't do much psychological damage
Interaction Studies 11 (2):196-200 (2010)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJames Gips (1994). Toward the Ethical Robot. In Kenneth M. Ford, C. Glymour & Patrick Hayes (eds.), Android Epistemology. MIT Press.
Keith Gunderson (1963). Interview with a Robot. Analysis 23 (June):136-142.
Margaret A. Boden (1995). Could a Robot Be Creative--And Would We Know? In Android Epistemology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Eric Steinhart (2007). Infinitely Complex Machines. In Intelligent Computing Everywhere. Springer.
Germund Hesslow & D.-A. Jirenhed (2007). The Inner World of a Simple Robot. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (7):85-96.
Christopher Grau (2011). There is No 'I' in 'Robot': Robots and Utilitarianism (Expanded & Revised). In Susan Anderson & Michael Anderson (eds.), Machine Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Noel Sharkey & Amanda Sharkey (2010). The Crying Shame of Robot Nannies: An Ethical Appraisal. Interaction Studies 11 (2):161-190.
Noel Sharkey & Amanda Sharkey (2010). Robot Nannies Get a Wheel in the Door: A Response to the Commentaries. Interaction Studies 11 (2):302-313.
Blay Whitby (2010). Oversold, Unregulated, and Unethical: Why We Need to Respond to Robot Nannies. Interaction Studies 11 (2):290-294.
van den Broek & L. Egon (2010). Robot Nannies: Future or Fiction? Interaction Studies 11 (2):274-282.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-16Total downloads7 ( #133,421 of 549,047 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,047 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
