Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 97 (1):7-30 (2009)
|Abstract||The author in terms of idealizational theory of science explicates two approaches to history represented by positivism (Hempel) and narrativism (White). According to positivism, history is branch of science, according to narrativism, history is closer to literature. In the second part of this paper, the author paraphrases some paradoxes of historical narrative elaborated by mentioned-above representatives of these standpoints what is argument for unity of scientific methods presupposed by idealizational theory of science.|
|Keywords||philosophy of history methodology of history idelization|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Andrew Aberdein (2003). Balderdash and Chicanery: Science and Beyond. In James South (ed.), Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Philosophy: Fear and Trembling in Sunnydale. Open Court.
D. N. Shanbhag, K. B. Archak & Michael (eds.) (2007). Science, History, Philosophy, and Literature in Sanskrit Classics: Dr. D.N. Shanbhag Felicitation Volume. Sundeep Prakashan.
Christie McDonald & Susan Rubin Suleiman (eds.) (2010). French Global: A New Approach to Literary History. Columbia University Press.
Richard Minadeo (1969). The Lyre of Science. Detroit, Wayne State University Press.
Harold Kaplan (1972). Democratic Humanism and American Literature. Chicago,University of Chicago Press.
Judith A. Little (ed.) (2007). Feminist Philosophy and Science Fiction: Utopias and Dystopias. Prometheus Books.
Patrick Colm Hogan (2003). Cognitive Science, Literature, and the Arts: A Guide for Humanists. Routledge.
Added to index2010-08-16
Total downloads4 ( #180,507 of 556,888 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?