Interstitio. East European Review of Historical Anthropology 2 (1):7-22 (2008)
|Abstract||The aim of this paper is to consider the standard objections put against the construction of metanarratives in the philosophy of history. The author distinguishes following intelectual sources questioning the grasp of Entirety in the philosophy of history: anti-naturalistic German philosophy of science, dogmatic Marxism, liberalism and postmodernism. Analysis of the content of these stances allows for disclose of hidden methodological and theoretical premises which are responsible for misunderstanding and critique of the historiosophical discourse|
|Keywords||Metanarrative postmodernism in history speculative philosophy of history|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Justin Thacker (2005). Lyotard and the Christian Metanarrative: A Rejoinder to Smith and Westphal. Faith and Philosophy 22 (3):301-315.
Callum G. Brown (2005). Postmodernism for Historians. Pearson/Longman.
J. C. D. Clark (2003/2004). Our Shadowed Present: Modernism, Postmodernism, and History. Stanford University Press.
Chris Hughes (2011). Liberal Democracy as the End of History: Fukuyama and Postmodern Challenges. Routledge.
Kaya Yilmaz (2010). Postmodernism and its Challenge to the Discipline of History: Implications for History Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (7):779-795.
Will Durant (2010). Lessons of History. Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.
Willie Thompson (2004). Postmodernism and History. Palgrave Macmillan.
K. M. Jamil & Saiyed Abdul Hai (eds.) (1969). Philosophy of History. [Dacca, Pakistan Philosophical Congress.
Richard J. Evans (1997). In Defence of History. Granta Books.
Added to index2012-10-25
Total downloads2 ( #232,684 of 551,007 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 551,007 )
How can I increase my downloads?